THE BAATIL OPTIMISM AND KUFR SUPPORT FOR KUFR LAW

(They – the human and jinn devils whisper their evil and adorned statements to one another) so that the hearts of those who do not believe in the Aakhirat incline to it (to their kufr), so that they become pleased with it, and so that they may indulge in whatever they (these kuffaar) fabricate.”  (Al-An’aam, Aayat 113)

What! Should I (Rasulullah –Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) search for another judge besides Allah whilst it is He Who has revealed to you (O Muslimeen!) the Kitaab with detailed explanation. And (even) those to whom We have given the Kitaab (Tauraah) know that it has been revealed from your Rabb with the Haqq. Therefore, do not become of the doubtful ones.”

(Al-An’aam, Aayat 114)

In a stupid statement issued by one Yusuf Patel on behalf of BOGUS ‘uucsa’, the kufr judgment of the Western Cape High Court is welcomed. The welcoming of the judgment of the court by an entity professing to be Muslim, speaks volumes for the jahaalat of the characters who constitute this BOGUS entity. The Jaahil, Yusuf Patel states in the statement that BOGUS ‘uucsa’ “supports the legal recognition of Muslim marriages, and their consequences, on the basis that the relevant legislation must be consistent with Islamic law.”

UNITY WITH BAATIL IS NOT PERMISSIBLE

Ḥaẓrat Maulānā Ashraf ‘Alῑ al-Thānwῑ Raḥmatullahi ‘Alayh writes:

Not every form of Unity is Praiseworthy and not every form of Disunity is Disparaged/Condemned

Understand properly that unity is only needed and deemed praiseworthy when it is beneficial for Deen, and disunity is only frowned upon when it is detrimental to Deen. When unity is harmful for Deen and disunity is beneficial for Deen, then at that point, disunity shall be sought. The people of this world have clearly understood this reality in their daily activities. Thus, in a court case, when a plaintiff and defendent raise their matter to a court for arbitration, then neither of the two is told, "Abjure your claim, because it has created disunity between the two of you and disunity is discouraged". Rather, the rule is that the person who is in contradiction of the Truth (Haqq) is told, ‘Return towards the Haqq and abandon your insistence upon the view that is in conflict with the Haqq’. In fact, in some matters, if the plaintiff forgoes his claim, then the government becomes the plaintiff and defends the Haqq.