plus minus gleich

Search our website

SUING MUFTI A.K. HOOSEN

E-mail Print PDF

A SHIAH SUPPORTER SUING MUFTI A.K. HOOSEN FOR R10 MILLION

A Durban resident, one character by the name E.Jadwat who is associated with the  pro-Shiah, anti-Sunnah haraam  Al-Qalam tabloid, is instituting legal action against Mufti A.K.Hoosen for alleged defamation. The chap who is a non-entity in terms of  the Shariah, and a Shiah supporter, claims that for the massive so-called ‘defamation’ he has suffered, Mufti A.K.Hoosen has to pay him R10 million.

The fellow’s lawyer, in the letter of demand states:

“Accordingly, we have been instructed to make the following demands:

24.1   Our client requires payment  from you as damages:

24.1.1   for defamation  R7.5  million

24.1.2  for   injuria        R2.5  million

Such sums to be paid to our client within twenty one (21) day of the date of this letter failing which our instructions are to institute legal proceedings in the High Court against you to recover these damages.”

This absolutely ludicrous, stupid and laughable demand of kufr  is voluminous testimony  for the total jahaalat of the Jadwat character. If he had  possessed even a rudimentary understanding of the Shariah of Allah Azza Wa Ja, he would not have demeaned  his brains with such a  silly demand of  kufr.  But, when Allah Ta’ala desires to disgrace a man, He  creates disequilibrium in the  thinking process of the person by casting RIJS on his brains. Thus, the Qur’aan Majeed states regarding this issue of the vermiculation of the Aql:

“And, He (Allah) casts RIJS on  those who lack Aql.”

When the Aql is  Divinely convoluted with RIJS , then a man will inflict on himself humiliation, making a laughing stock of himself to even  children. While this type of shaitaani  claim makes ‘sense’ to kuffaar and Shiahs, all true Muslims understand the satanism underlying the haraam demand. When a man who claims to be a ‘prominent’ chap in the community lacks the  very basic Islamic knowledge to understand the  ludicrousness and the hurmat of this type of  claim which has absolutely no  validity in the Shariah, then he testifies for his own gross jahaalat and even kufr.

Jadwat’s  shaitaani claim of R10 million stems  from the Haqq which Mufti A.K.Hoosen has stated regarding his (Jadwat’s) pro-Shiah stand which Islamically assigns him  to the Shiah camp. Shiahs are kuffaar in the unaninous  Fatwa of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah. Any  man who professes to be a Muslim but  who defends Shiahs, sympathizes with Shiahs, or seeks to promote  Shiah views,  loses his Imaan. He  becomes a Murtadd.

Support for the cause of Shi’ism implies  hatred for Rasulullah (Sallalahu alayhi wasallam) because Nabi-e-Kareem (Sallallahu alayhi wasalam) said:

“Fear Allah! Fear Allah!  Whoever loves my Sahaabah, does so because of love for me, and whoever  hates my Sahaabah, does so because he hates me.”

“Honour my Sahaabah, for verily they are the noblest of you.”

A cardinal article of Shiah faith -  the pivotal  fulcrum on which the Shiah religion revolves is hatred and  the vilest animosity for the Sahaabah in general, and in particular  for Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar, Hadhrat  Uthmaan, Aishah Siddiquah and Hadhrat Muaawiyah (Radhiyallahu anhum).

Mufti A.K.Hoosen had laid bare the Shiah facade of Jadwat, and  had extensively commented  on Jadwat’s Shiah stance in the light of the Shariah. Having exposed Jadwat’s Shiah leanings,  he now seeks to extract vengeance  by demanding R10 million from Mufti A.K.Hoosen. Perhaps he labours under the  misconception of the Muslim community being too dumb or insane so as not to  comprehend the stupid notoriety of his stupid shaitaani demand of R10 million.

In the  puerile letter of demand, the lawyer makes a host of  stupid and frivolous claims to justify the laughable  sum of R10 million.  The list of ‘defamatory’  flotsam  attributed to Mufti A.K.Hoosen by Jadwat further confirms the RIJS which Allah Azza Wa Jal has cast on his Aql.

Insha-Allah, in future articles, after the chap has issued summons, we shall dissect and show the  silliness and  shaitaaniyat of his allegations. In this article we shall confine ourselves to  show that  this Jadwat character is  a supporter of  the Shiahs, and as such loses his Imaan. In this regard, we reproduce, two of Jadwat’s letters which  demonstrate his  support for  the Shiah religion.  In these two letters, he defends the Shiah  zina practice of Mu’tah, the Shiah priest, Khomeini, and he seeks  to  clear the Shiah from their veneration of Lu’lu, the murderer of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu ahu). If Jadwat is not a Shiah or a Shiah sympathizer, what business does he have   with   defending the Shiahs and  labouring abortively to exonerate them from the  charges which the Ahus Sunnah have levelled against  Shi’ism  for  more than  12 centuries?  Just what is Jadwat’s concern and why does he take umbrage when  the Ulama of the Ahlus Sunnah  condemn the Shiah kuffaar?

Is only Jadwat right, and the  innumerable thousands of Ulama of the Ahlus Sunnah down the long corridor of Islam’s history are in  grievous error for their condemnation of the Shiah religion? From which  planet does Jadwat hail to qualify  him to speak with  any authority on issues of Shar’i import? When the authorities of the Shariah  have proclaimed Shiahs as kuffaar,  on what Shar’i basis does  this non-entity Jadwat refute the Fatwa of the Shariah? What are Jadwat’s Shar’i credentials which  permit him to  voice himself on  issues of  Fiqh and Aqaaid?

Being the boss of Ideal Outfitters may qualify him to trade in  kuffaar styled garments.  Being a member of  IPC which itsef is a non-entity in terms of  Shar’i Uloom, does not  qualify Jadwat to voice himself on  Shariah issues. He  states  that he is linked to  the MYM. This in fact is a confession of his Shiah status. The MYM with its haraam tabloid, Al-Qalam, are avowed supporters and promoters of Shi’ism. Just recently, this haraam shaitaani tabloid  carried an article in defence of Shiahs and their temple complex in Cape Town. That these entities are  promoters and supporters of the Shiahs, there is no  doubt.

A Muslim  cannot remain a Muslim if he supports  any facet of Shi’ism. But  Jadwat and  his friend, one Timol character, are at pains in their  abortive labour to bestow respectability, dignity and legality to the Shiah Mut’ah prostitution practice. On this score alone, it will be valid to  excommunicate  these promoters and defenders of Shiah mut’ah.

In his letter, Jadwat seeks to justify  the Shiah  Mut’ah practice by analogizing it with  alleged prostitution perpetrated by the Saudis. The practices of the miscreant Saudis do not constitute  daleel in Islam. In fact, the recent kufr  upheavals in Saudi Arabia  has  placed that unfortunate miserable regime  with its kufr on the Road of Jahannam.

Highlighting Shiah kufr by the Ulama of the Ahlus Sunnah cannot be  decried  if the Saudis are not criticized. These are two separate topics. If the Saudis are not  condemned, it does not logically follow that Shiah mut’ah is halaal and that it is not prostitution.  The  fundamnetal question is: Why  does a professed Sunni  defend the Shiahs? Every   true Muslim  who loves Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and his Sahaabah, will understand that such a defender of Shiahs is  a Shiah. His kufr  lies  deeply embedded in his heart.  His Shiah support  conspicuously betrays his  Shi’ism and exposes  what  conceals in the heart. Insha-Allah, more shall follow.

The following are  two of Jadwat’s letters.

His letter to his friend Timol:

From: zohrar

Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 9:15 AM

To: 'Dawood Timol'

Subject: RE: Re

Dawood Timol,     As-salaamu-alaikum         Thanks for email.  Mutah is one of the weapons they use to discredit Shias.  At IPCI we had many visitors from Saudi Arabia who wanted sex via a concocted term for a temporary liaison.  Also thousands of Sunni Arabs go to India and conduct these temporary marriages.  Wslm

Ebrahim Jadwat

His letter to Mufti A.K.Hoosen

From: zohrar Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 12:54 PM

To: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it Dear respected Mufti A.K. Hoosen,

In response to your email of 19th June, and specifically to answer your Question as to why there was no Sunni Masjid in Tehran, I list below some of the Sunni Masajids in Tehran that I am aware of (there could well be others that I am not aware of):

1- Sadeghiyeh mosque, located in the Second Square Sadeghiyeh
2- TehranPars Mosque, Located in Dellavaran St
3- Shahre Qods mosque,located 20 km Karaj old road
4- Khalij-e-Fars(Persian Gulf)mosque, located
5- Alnby mosque, located in the Town of Danesh
6- Haft'joub mosque, located in Malard
7- Vahidiyeh mosque, located in Shahriyar
8- Nasim Shahr mosque, located in Akbar Abad
9- Razi Abad mosque, located in Se'rah Shahriyar

With respect, do our ulema really look for a Sunni Masjid or assume that there is none in Teheran, and make Fitna by giving out incorrect information. I wonder how many of them are really interested in locating Sunni Masjids or rather want to confirm their preconceived notions.

To the best of my knowledge, all the Pro-Saudi Gang of Four (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE, Bahrain) especially the Indo Pakistani Ulema have been making these false allegation and thus creating division within the ummah. Is it not time that we ask acknowledge the reality and speak the truth about Teheran and its Sunni mosques? Islam is very strong of the consequences of peddling misinformation and I am sure that none of the ulema want to fall into that trp.

2- Imam Khomeini’s Book is known as Tahrir Al Wasilah, not Tawdehul Masail. Did you read the book in Pharsee or in English, and can you please cite the page / version that you are referring to as the original, to the best of my knowedge. does not make any statement condoning prostitution. This is a serious allegation and clarity would be appreciated for my own understanding.

3- Or are you referring to The book which is known as Tahrirolvasyleh in Persian. It has been published under the title Kitab al-Fiqh, and the website of Ayatollah Muhammad Fazel Lankarani has listed the book under the title Tafsil-al-Shariah.

4- With regards to the Shrine supposedly dedicated to the killer of Hazrat Umar (RA), Mohammed Salim al-Awa, secretary general of the International Union of Muslim Scholars who visited the site told Al Arabiya  that the "the tomb is for an old Sufi person in Iran, and the Iranian authorities have closed it."  Are you sure that this is the shrine you visited?

PS. One other point *While I acknowledge that you the learned one, and know the Qur’an better than I do, way nowhere in the Quran are Jews referred to as Kafirs; rather, they are referred to as “People of the Book”. Again, if you can provide the verse it would be appreciated for my own understanding.

I really want to thank you for setting aside time for my queries. Learning is a lifelong process and I have benefited enormously through these exchanges. Do keep up the good work you are doing in South America. Wslm                               Ebrahim Jadwat

(End of Jadwat’s letter)

There is a clear percolation of Shiah support  in both letters. In an earlier article, all the flotsam  points raised by Jadwat in his letter have been  debunked.

 

24 Rabiyuth Thaani 1439 (12 January 2018)

 

Hijri Date











Moon Phase