plus minus gleich

Search our website

COMMENTS OF THE PRO-SHIAH

E-mail Print PDF

THE PLOT AT THE SHIAH TEMPLE

AND THE RUBBISH COMMENTS OF THE PRO-SHIAH ZANADIQAH-MURTADDEEN

In the wake of the plot perpetrated by sinister forces at the Shiah temple in Verulam, munaafiqeen lurking in the folds of the Muslim community – zanadiqah-murtaddeen – who are anti-Sunnah, but who profess themselves as ‘muslims’, have deemed it appropriate to issue rubbish statements by which they disgorged their animosity for the Deen of Islam and their love for the kufr of Shi’ism. Then we have others who are driven by fear, spinelessly issuing trash, bootlicking statements to curry favour with the enemies of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the enemies of the Sahaabah.

There is a need to respond and refute these rubbish and trash statements. Insha-Allah, we shall do so in several articles to highlight the absolute rubbish with which the haters of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the lovers of the haters of the Sahaabah are attempting to besmirch the Haqq of Islam which the Ulama-e-Haqq are upholding and propagating.

THE RUBBISH STATEMENT OF AFTAB HAIDER

Aftab Haider, the Shiah spokesman, claimed:

“Shias in South Africa had been subjected to a prolonged hate campaign. He said that the attack may be connected to the Sunni extremist group Islamic State.”

Haider has only highlighted his own gross ignorance and has disgorged drivel with the underlying motive of creating hatred for the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah, i.e. Muslims. This has been the standard stance of Shiahs since time immemorial, and the very first target of their hatred were the Sahaabah and the Holy Wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

In his rubbish statement, he claims that Shiahs in South Africa have been subjected to a prolonged hatred campaign. We challenge him to produce his proof. Who among the Ulama of the Ahlus Sunnah have propagated hatred against the Shiahs? What are their statements of hate? Since this Shiah has brazenly slandered the Ahlus Sunnah, it is imperative now for him to explain in detail the statements of ‘hatred’ of the Ulama-e-Haqq – the statements which constitute the alleged ‘prolonged campaign of hate’. If he fails, and most assuredly he will miserably fail, then his blatant lies and slander will be conspicuously displayed. We say with emphasis that he will not be able to cite a single statement which in terms of the Shariah, and also in terms of kuffaar secular law, can be said to constitute ‘hate speech’.

When the Haqq of Islam is stated with clarity, then characters of Haider’s ilk interpret it as ‘hate speech’ because they have no academic and no rational response for the Truth. Therefore they seek to bamboozle the ignorant and the unwary by churning up hatred for the Ahlus Sunnah, i.e. for Muslims, and the zanaadiqah-murtaddeen lurking in the Muslim community are their active supporters.

The Truth which Haider and his ilk are portraying as the ‘prolonged campaign of hate’ consists of the following Ingredients of Haqq which are based on the Qur’aan and Sunnah:

(1) Shiahs reject the authenticity of the Qur’aan Majeed. They believe that the Qur’aan is the fabrication of the Sahaabah.

(2) The vast majority of the Sahaabah has reneged from Islam becoming murtaddeen.

(3) Hadhrat Aishah (Radhiyallahu anha) had committed adultery.

(4) Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar and Hadhrat Uthmaan (Radhiyallahu anhum) had usurped the Khilaafate.

(5) When the Shiahs gain control of Madinah they will exhume the bodies of Hadhrat Abu Bakr and Hadhrat Umar, and of Hadhrat Aishah and mete out the punishment of flogging prescribed for adultery.

(6) That taqiyah (holy hypocrisy) is a great act of virtue.

(7) That mut’ah which according to the Ahus Sunnah is prostitution, is a great act of virtue.

(8) That the slaughtered animals of Shiahs are not halaal for Muslims.

(9) That marriage between  Shiahs and Muslims is not valid.

(10)That those who subscribe to these beliefs are not Muslims.

This list is not exhaustive. There are numerous grave issues of doctrinal differences between Muslims and Shiahs just as there are many and grave  doctrinal differences between Muslims and Hindus, Muslims and Christians, Muslims and Jews, etc.

Just as Islam labels Christians, Jews and Hindus as kuffaar, so too does it label Shiahs as kuffaar. This is not hate-speech.  These are valid religious differences which have existed between Muslims and Shiahs since time immemorial. If Shiahs proclaim themselves to be ‘muslims’, and we do not accept them as Muslims in view of the glaring doctrinal conflicts, but are compelled to say that they are Muslims, it will be a violation of our religious rights and in conflict of the secular principle of freedom of religion to compel us to believe that the Shiah non-Muslims are Muslims. They are ‘muslims’ in terms of their own understanding, but not Muslim according to our understanding. Their use of the Muslim appellation causes confusion and is deceptive.

To claim that saying Hindus and Christians are kuffaar is hate speech is a display of gross stupidity. The Qur’aan is replete with the label of ‘kuffaar’ for those who do not subscribe to the beliefs of Islam as do the Ahlus Sunnah, that is, those whom we believe to be Muslims.

There is no law in this land to compel us to accept Shiahs as ‘muslims’. There is no law to prohibit us from stating the Haqq as we understand it on the basis of the Qur’aan, the Ahaadith and the Jurisprudence of the Aimmah Mujtahideen.

It devolves on Haider to substantiate his slanderous and satanic allegations of ‘hate speech’ and the hallucinated ‘prolonged campaign of hate’.

Qadianis and Ahmedis have also been branded kuffaar on the basis of their beliefs of kufr despite them professing to be Muslims. But no one had interpreted such fatwas of kufr as ‘hate speech’ as do the post-Shah Shiahs who acquired their guidance of hate and violence from Khomeni who had issued the edict to kill the kaafir / murtad Rushdi for his blasphemous writings. Not a single Muslim organization nor a single Muslim state had legalized or ordered the killing of Rushdi. The Shiahs were the sole exception. They had ordered that Rushdi be killed wherever he is found in the world. Now who are the culprits and criminals who propagate hatred, violence and murder? Khomeini was the ‘greatest’ imaam of the Shiahs in this modern era.

Qadianis and Ahmedis also call themselves ‘muslims’ while the Ahlus Sunnah label them as kuffaar, and this is a doctrinal issue which has no association with hate speech or violence.

Haider, the Shiah, baselessly, without a vestige of evidence, attributes the villainy at the Shiah temple to ISIS. Then he commits the added notoriety of describing ISIS as ‘Sunni’. This conspicuously exposes his ignorance, either deliberate or feigned. ISIS is not and was not part of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah. In this era only the followers of the Four Math-habs (Hanafi, Maaliki, Shaafi and Hambali) comprise the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah which is abbreviated by the term ‘Sunni’. There are other deviant sects which also call themselves ‘sunni’, whist they are not part of the Ahlus Sunnah. The Qabar Pujaari sect (the Grave-Worshippers) also call themselves ‘sunni’ whilst they have no affinity with the Ahlus Sunnah.

The fourth stupidity of Haider is his ignorance of the leadership of ISIS.  Apart from it being a U.S. creation, the hierarchy of Isis is atheist. They belonged to the Ba’th Party of Saddam Husain. Those who subscribed to the beliefs of the Ba’th Party were not Muslims despite masquerading as Muslims as do the Qadinais, Ahmedis and Shiahs.

Predicating ISIS with the ‘Sunni’ appellation is calculated to foment hatred between Shiahs and Muslims. The palpable reason for the allegation that ‘Sunni’ ISIS had committed the atrocity is to convey the evil, false and satanic impression that Muslims have committed the misdeed. There is no other reason for the utilization of this term in the ISIS context. Haider is liable for hate speech designed to create anarchy in the country.

From the very inception of the ISIS ghost, Al-Haq and The Majlis has exposed and criticized ISIS as a U.S. surrogate creation. Almost every issue of Al-Haq stridently and unambiguously criticizes ISIS. Only dishonest zindeeqs, murtaddeen and munaafiqeen will cast a deliberate blind eye on our vehement criticism of ISIS over a period of several years from its very beginning.

The so-called ‘prolonged campaign of hate’ which Haider stupidly and falsely alleges, is nothing but a statement of Truth explaining Islamic doctrines to ignorant Muslims who are deceived by Shiahs using their taqiyah doctrine to mislead and deceive Muslims into believing that Shi’ism is Islam. That is precisely why the need has developed for a sustained propagation of the Truth of Islam – the Islam that we Muslims subscribe to, not the shiah brand.

To be continued, Insha-Allah

28 Sha’baan 1439 - 15 May 2018

 

Hijri Date











Moon Phase