plus minus gleich

Search our website

Tariq Jameel, enemy of Islam

E-mail Print PDF




One of the gravest dangers to the Imaan of ignorant and unwary Muslims is the Dajjaal in the form of Tariq Jamil. This agent of Iblees, despite his hypocritical efforts and Taqiyah, has failed to adequately conceal his Shi’ism from intelligent Muslims.

Confirming that he is a Shiah, this small Dajjaal is currently promoting the idea of using the word, ‘Maula’, when referring to Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu). In substantiation this Jaahil Shiah Munāfiq cites a hadith in which Nabi –e- Kareem (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) refers to Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) with the term, Maula.


Mismanipulating the literal application of this word, Tariq Dajjaal is actively promoting an idea which not a single authority of Islam since the age of the Sahaabah had even entertained - even for a cursory glance or debate. It had never occurred to any Sahaabi to address Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) with ‘Maula’. It did not occur to any of the Taabi-een nor to any of the Tab-e-Tabieen nor to any of the innumerable thousands of Fuqaha, Ulama and Auliya down the long 14 Century corridor of Islam’s history to address Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) with the title ‘Maula’. Noteworthy is the fact, that almost all the Sufi Salaasil have as their initiator Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu), yet they did not say ‘Maula’ Ali.

Now, in this belated 15th century in close proximity of Qiyaamah, a son of Iblees, an agent of Dajjaal, in furtherance of Shi’ism to undermine Islam, is promoting the obnoxious idea of scuttling the Sunnah by substituting ‘Hadhrat’ with the Shiah ‘Maula’ appellation.

On the remote assumption that Rasullullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) had titled Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) with the term ‘Maula’, then too, it will be highly inappropriate to predicate Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) with this title which the Shiah enemies of Islam have coined. The stupendous question remains: Why did the Sahaabah and the entire Ummah NOT address Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) by this Shiah ‘Maula’ title.This should suffice to thoroughly debunk the falsehood that Rasulullah (Sallallah Alayhi Wasallam) had titled Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) ‘Maula’.

The title ‘Maula’ is the product of Shiah mis-manipulation, not misinterpretation. Genuine misinterpretation is possible. However, the Shiahs have deliberately mis-manipulated the Hadith in a stupid abortive attempt to gain credibility for their concept of divinity with which they cloak Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu) and their so-called ‘Ma’soom’ (Sinless/Infallible) Imaams.

The term ‘Maula’ in the Hadith is of literal significance. It simply means ‘friend’. Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam), had used a variety of benevolent terms to describe different Sahaabah. The words had literal application and were not titles used figuratively. The term simply means ‘friend’, and it conveys the close ties of love and affection.

Besides this particular Hadith, there are several other narrations pertaining to the fadhaa-il (virtue) of Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu). The Shiahs tear these narrations from their clear context and ascribe meaning of doctrinal significance for affirming their corrupt divinity concept.Just as there are Ahādith regarding the fadhaa-il of Hadhrat Ali (Radhiyallahu anhu), so too, are there many Ahādith about many Sahaabah in which the glowing virtues of the various Sahabah are recorded. More of this Dajjaal’s convoluted mis-manipulations of Ahādith and Qur’anic Aayaat shall be exposed and refuted in future articles, Insha’Allah.


Hijri Date