plus minus gleich

Search our website

MUNAAFIQ “LIFE-SAVERS”

E-mail Print PDF

WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE MUNAAFIQ “LIFE-SAVERS”?

WHERE ARE THE ‘FRIENDS OF THE COURT’ AND THE FIENDS OF ALLAH – WHY ARE THEIR MOUTHS NOW SEALED?

Every Muslim will recall that the Munaafiq Reverend Abraham Bham, the Munaafiq Tony Karan, Kalb Yusuf Patel, Bogus uucsa’s Munaafiq Talib Igsaan and other Kilaabun Naar of the same ilk had vehemently contested in the High Court the opening of the Musaajid in the kufr capacity as ‘friends of the court’ which according to the Shariah rendered them FIENDS (ENEMIES) of Allah. 

The sole grounds of this mob of Munaafiqeen in their opposition to the Muslim Community’s demand for opening the Musaajid was to “save lives” – lives which in their copro-opinions would be exposed to danger and death by the Houses of Allah Ta’ala, hence at all costs the Musaajid should remain closed since these Kilaabun Naar implicitly believe that the Musaajid are the worst spreaders of the virus. Their whole devilish clamour spawned by their Nifaaq was structured on their hallucinatory basis of ‘saving lives’. 

A chap, with a Muslim-sounding name, called Prof Shabbir Madhi had provided an affidavit in support of the Bogus uucsa Munaafiqeen. Thus, he was together with the Bogus uucsa Kilaabun Naar a bird of the feather. They had satanically projected the falsity of ‘saving lives’ as their trump card to convince the court of the ‘imperative’ need to seal the Musaajid and to debar the Fardh Salaat and Jumuah Salaat. 

Now, just after a couple of days, the professor chap makes a round-about turn to shift from the position he had adopted to assist his Munaafiqqen friends of Bogus uucsa. Now, he has conveniently forgotten the great and primary dictate of their feigned altruism of ‘saving lives’. Now this professor fellow says that the modelling of how many people would contract the disease and perish was “flawed and illogical and made wild assumptions”. Quoting the Madhi fellow, the Financial Mail said on 24 April 2020:  “Madhi says the initial modelling and fatality estimates were “back-of-envelope calculations”.

Madhi says he raised problems with the model at that time. Nowhere in the world – not even in Wuhan – had 10% of the population contracted the virus.  “I told them at the start, this is implausible, he tells the FM.

He claims the model was not sufficiently flexible to adjust for infection rates, depending on how many other people in the population had contracted the virus. As it is, the more people who are infected, the fewer the new people a contagious person can potentially affect.

However, its initial figure of 350,000 deaths was frightening –10 times more that the number of people who die annually of tuberculosis, S.A.’s biggest killer. Madhi says those mortality rates were based on "wild assumptions".”

 

It was on the basis of these “wild assumptions” that the government had wildly ordered the lockdown which has devastated every department of life in the country.

Continuing the report, the Financial Mail says:

“That 25,000 number sounds high, but Madhi says that’s probably equal to the number of people who die of TB in SA each year, which would never lead to a national lockdown. In part, he says, this is because TB is out of sight – a disease of the poor which predominantly kills in the rural areas.

Stats SA figures show that in 2017,  25,336 people died of diabetes and 22,259 died of cerebrovascular disease, which includes strokes and aneurysms.  That year, 28,678 people died of TB.” (But no lockdown. No attempt to save lives! )

“Madhi also warns that no-one is modelling the “collateral damage” of the lockdown, and the impact of the economic meltdown on disease and death…….

However, as Madhi says, poverty can make things worse. It increases the risk of contracting TB in high-density settings like informal settings and fuels HIV infections as women trade sex for money, to cite just two examples.”

 

At the time, just a few days ago, when Madhi was supporting the haraam, shaitaani case of the Munaafiqeen of Bogus uucsa to retain the ban on the Musaajid, it was grotesquely weird that he had no awareness of the facts which he now ventilates. 

Now when even the government’s primary base for the lockdown is some other fellow, Kareem, has also mellowed his stance and  inclines to lifting the lockdown, it is  prudent to ask: What  has happened to the ultra-altruism of ‘saving lives’? Why are the Bogus uccsa Munaafiqeen now not trumpeting their slogan of “saving lives”. Why are they not valiantly emerging from their cloisters to champion the cause of ‘saving lives’, and demanding that the lockdown stays in place and that the variety of concessions now granted by the government be cancelled? After all, granting concession will kill lives, not ‘save lives’ as the Munaafiqeen had demanded.

 

All concessions are valid for these spineless Kilaabun Naar Fiends of Allah. Only the Musaajid are ‘viable’ targets and will kill lives if opened. Only the Musaajid are danger zones. May Allah’s La’nat destroy these Fiends of Allah.

 

The government has now granted the film industry concessions. 50 fujjaar are allowed to gather in the film industry, but the uucsa Munaafiqeen have argued that even 10 musallis with their heads on the ground in Sujood pose the gravest danger for the lives of the population. They have assigned the zina industry a hallowed pedestal, whilst for them the Musaajid are the worst of places. But Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that the best and most loved places on earth to Allah are the MUSAAJID, and the worst and most satanic places on earth are the malls and the like. What status does the zina film industry occupy in this equation?

IS THERE NOW ANY DOUBT IN THE NIFAAQ OF THESE MUNAAFIQ KILAABUN NAAR OF BOGUS uucsa? WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THESE LIFE-SAVERS? THE PEOPLE ARE DYING, AND THEY HAVE AS YET NOT SALLIED FORTH TO SAVE THEIR LIVES!!!

 

Undoubtedly, those molvis who had closed the Musaajid and banned Salaat in the Musaajid are Munaafiqs and Murtads. Such vile molvis come fully within the purview of the Qur’aanic Aayat:

“Who is a greater zaalim (oppressor) than the one who prevents the Name of Allah from the Musaajid, and he strives in the ruin of the Musaajid?”                       (Al-Baqarah, 114)

18 Ramadhaan 1441 – 12 May 2020

 

Hijri Date











Moon Phase