plus minus gleich

Search our website

‘MISREPRESENTATION’

E-mail Print PDF

‘MISREPRESENTATION’ OF BOGUS UUCSA AND REVEREND BHAM

 

In a letter to the representatives of these bogus and shaitaani entities, Professor Mohammed A.K.Omar of Durban stated:

 

From: MAK Omar [mailto: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ]

Sent: Friday, 01 May 2020 10:55 PM

To: ' This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ' < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Cc: ' This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ' < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >; ' This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ' < This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it >

Subject: Misrepresentation re- Court proceedings

 

Dear Most Respected Moulana Karan,

Sheikh Taliep,

Moulana Bham

 

As-salaamoalikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh

 

The recent judgement was not unexpected as I had stated in my last communique (19/4/2020).

 

I wish to reiterate that UUCSA’s decision to act as Amicus Curiae was ill-advised and certainly not conducive to promoting  harmony among Muslims.

 

I now refer to your  public statement of 24/4/2020 on possible misrepresentations during the recent court proceedings. What concerns me is the apparent misrepresentations by UUCSA in its court affidavit and by one of UUCSA’s executive member in an article in the Daily Maverick (15/4/2020),

for which I requested clarification but have not yet received a reply.

 

These requests were sent on 19/4/2020 and 16/4/2020 respectively.

 

I had asked on what basis does UUCSA claim in its affidavit that JUSA represents the majority of the Ulema in KwaZulu Natal and what was the reference for the observation in  Moulana Bham’s article (Daily Maverick) that 25% of COVID-related deaths in the U.K. occurred in Muslims. It is now 15 days since I requested this reference and in spite of a reminder sent on 22/4/2019 there has been no response.

 

It is indeed sad to note that even my non-muslim colleagues will respond within a day or two to a similar request. I can only speculate on possible reasons for the failure to respond. Was this figure

based on hearsay or an assumption ? Your latest public statement confirms my suspicion. Unlike in the Daily Maverick article, this figure now is couched with vague and ambiguous terms, viz: “emerging evidence indicates…...”

 

I managed to glean accurate and reliable information on the ethnic breakdown in COVID-related mortality in the U.K. According to statistics released by the U.K. National Health Service, as at 17/4/2020, 18.7% of COVID-related deaths collectively occurred in Blacks, Asians and those of mixed ethnicity.

 

Unfortunately it did not provide further breakdown of these groups in terms of ethnicity, let alone religion. Of relevance is that these ethnic groups

together constituted 14% of the U.K. population (2011census). Assuredly the COVID –related Muslim mortality will be far less than the 25% stated by

UUCSA.

 

In conclusion I would like to emphasise that as Muslims, let alone the Ulema, it is of paramount importance to document accurate and reliable information in our communications.

 

Yours in Islam

 

Mohammed A.K. Omar

 

P.S. Up to now my communiques with UUCSA and Moulana Bham have been essentially a private matter. However, in view of the lack of response to my two requests and the peddling of information based on assumptions and generalisations I have decided, most reluctantly, to let the public be privy to my correspondences

(End of Professor Omar’s letter)

 

These Agents of Iblees feast on lies. Among their lies and acts of kufr are:

 

1) They claim to represent all the Ulama of South Africa

2) They claim to represent the entire Muslim community of South Africa

3) They claim that their corrupt fatwas are binding on all Muslims

4) They claim that Shiahs are Muslims

5) They claim that the Houses of Allah Ta’ala – the Musaajid – are super-spreaders of disease

6) They petitioned and begged the kuffaar court to close the Musaajid

7) The abrogated Jumuah Salaat

8) They cancelled the daily Jamaat of the five Fardh Salaat

9) They claim that Rasulullah’s tareeqah of standing shoulder to shoulder in the sufoof in the Musaajid spreads the disease

10) They claim that the Masnoon Musaafahah (handshaking) spreads the disease

11) They claim that copies of the Qur’aan Majeed in the Musaajid are disease carriers

12) In support of their LIES, they present fabricated facts and figures as the letter of Professor Omar shows

 

And their daily life is of fisq and fujoor. They are the shayaateen who halaalize carrion, picture-making, and they participate in the kufr interfaith movement whose aim is the demolition of Islam. According to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) these molvis and sheikhs are the worst scoundrels under the canopy of the sky. Fitnah diffuses every capillary in their bodies, and the stench of this fitnah percolates from every aperture of their bodies. Their faces are dark with Divine La’nat.

22 Jamadith Thaani 1443 – 25 January 2022

Last Updated on Thursday, 03 February 2022 10:34  

Hijri Date