plus minus gleich

Search our website

ACTION AGAINST MUFTI A.K.HOOSEN

E-mail Print PDF

THE NAVLAKHI-LOCKHAT CARRION CABAL OF SANHA SEEKING KUFFAAR PENAL ACTION AGAINST MUFTI A.K.HOOSEN

    Mufti A.K.Hoosen's stance on the Haqq – proclaiming all chickens halaalized by the conglomerate of halaalization hawkers, HARAAM CARRION – has been too much for  Sanha's Carrion Cabal to digest. In a desperate bid to find relief for its  emotional depression, Navlakhi and Lockhat have turned for succour to the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa which is a non-Muslim entity.  Carrion-Halaalizing obliterates mental equilibrium, hence we find this shaitaani Carrion Cabal outrightly rejecting the proposed mediation by Mufti  Radhaul Haq Sahib whom  this self-same Carrion Cabal had anointed : THE GRAND MUFTI OF SOUTH AFRICA, when this had suited their carrion agenda.

   The Carrion Cabal had misled Mufti Radhaul Haq Saheb in order to extract a fatwa of permissibility for Rainbow's carrion chickens. At that juncture when the fatwa-extraction process had been accomplished,  the Navlakhi and Lockhat characters had, from the rooftops, blared and howled that Hadhrat Mufti Radhaul Haq is the GRAND MUFTI OF SOUTH AFRICA. This miserable Carrion Cabal had promoted the blatantly false idea that SANHA operated fully under the spiritual direction of the Grand Mufti of S.A.

   Today when the Carrion Cabal has created a needless, futile, haraam dispute with Mufti A.K.Hoosen because of his stand on the Haqq, they (Navlakhi and Lockhat), rejecting the mediation proposal to be presided over by the  Honourable Grand Mufti of S.A., Hadhrat  Mufti Radhaul  Haq Sahib,  run to the non-Muslim BCCSA seeking nafsaani vengeance against Mufti A.K.Hoosen.  What is their Shar'i basis for rejecting the Shar'i mediation process headed by their mutual Ustaadh, the Grand Mufti of S.A.? Their rejection betrays  the subtle kufr in their hearts – the kufr of rejecting the Qur'aan's command: "When two Muslim parties  fight/dispute, then make peace between them." Thus, their kufr has constrained this vile Carrion Cabal of SANHA to spurn the Qur'aanic Olive Branch offered to amicably, brotherly and Islamically settle a simple, but uncalled for controversy churned up by the nafsaaniyat of the Navlakhi-Lockhat Carrion Clique.

   There is no Deeni and no rational   reason for the obdurate refusal to submit to a Shar'i process of mediation, and that too, presided over by their own senior Ustaadh, the Grand Mufti of South Africa – a pedestal which this self-same Carrion Cabal had conferred on Hadhrat Mufti Radhaul Haq Sahib at the time when they had managed by deception to extravasate a fatwa of Jawaaz (permissibility)   for Rainbow's haraam  Maitah chickens.

   Even a cursory glance at the contents of the Carrion Cabal's letter to the BCCSA will convince any intelligent Muslim of the stupidity, futility and impermissibility of the complaints lodged by the misguided Carrion Clique. In the introductory paragraphs of the letter, the Carrion Cabal attempts to project a holy picture of themselves. They meander at length to impress the BCCSA by presenting a portrayal of their imagined credentials of respect, honour, reverence and seniority whereas they possess nothing of this sort of attributes. Airing their laments, the Carrion Cable states in its letter:  "The presenter  of this regular weekly programme, a Mufti A.K.Hoosen, levelled  malicious remarks against the integrity (sic- The Majlis) of our organization employing innuendo and untruths. He further omitted the very significant fact that the Rainbow poultry plant enjoys certification and approval of all Halaal bodies in the country but instead, in a display of partiality and prejudice singled out only SANHA for derision." 

      The puerility of this complaint illustrates the twaddle disgorged by brains deranged by carrion halaalizing. Mufti A.K.Hoosen's unambiguous proclamation of Haraam – that Rainbow chickens are Haraam – is not an untruth nor does it have any resemblance with innuendo. His  averment that he does not trust any of the halaalizing organizations is not a malicious remark. It further belies the Carrion Cable's  assertion of partiality and prejudice in favour of the other miserable carrion halaalizers. However, in the context of Hanafi Muslims who are the dominant segment of the Ummah in  Natal and Transvaal (Gauteng, etc.), there is an imperative need to single out SANHA for criticism. The MJC has no relevance and no recognition among Hanafi Muslims. The Muslims of these two provinces do not consume products halaalized by the MJC carrion halaalizers. The NIHT is, comparatively speaking, a silly backbencher who does not command acceptance in the Muslim community. Icsa is a non-entity in its death throes. It enjoys absolutely no credibility in any section of the Muslim community.

   In contrast to the other carrion halaalizing outfits, SANHA by virtue of the credibility conferred to it in its initial phase of existence by the support   of Jamiatul Ulama Natal and the then Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal, which support it no longer enjoys, poses the real threat to the Imaan and Akhlaaq of the Muslims of the two provinces. Muslims here have become addicted to devouring the rotten, diseased, haraam carrion  which the Carrion Cabal halaalizes, hence the incumbent need to single out this miserable entity so as to deracinate it for safeguarding the physical and spiritual fibre of the Muslim community. Thus, the singling out of SANHA for criticism is a logical and a rational demand. Hence, whatever Mufti A.K.Hoosen has said about the Carrion Cabal is nothing but the Haqq which is bitter and indigestible for Navlakhi and Lockhat. It is necessary to point out that Navlakhi is in reality Lockhat's  submissive poodle.

   Assuming that Mufti A.K.Hoosen's  stance of the Haqq  had also contained the elements of innuendo and untruths, could this not be Islamically resolved by their senior Ustaadh, the Grand Mufti of S.A.  whose verdict Mufti A.K.Hoosen has agreed to accept and abide by? How is it possible for the non-Muslim BCCSA to  decide a Deeni issue between Ulama? And, what type of 'muslim' brains are prepared to  disgrace the Ulama Fraternity by hauling a Brother Aalim  to a forum which conducts its affairs strictly in accord with kufr law?  The fact that the Carrion Cabal deemed it appropriate to run to a non-Muslim forum to seek relief  pertaining to an issue of Haqq and Baatil – halaal and haraam – testifies for their lack of Imaan, for the Qur'aan Majeed  declares:   "Then We have established you on a Shariah with regard to all your affairs. Therefore submit to it, and do not follow the vain desires of those who know not." It is only kufr lurking within the recesses of the heart that constrains professed Muslims to seek the directives and decrees of kuffaar entities and forums  which have absolutely no truck with Islam.

   If the Carrion Cabal entity of SANHA persists with its obduracy to follow the haraam kufr route which it has initiated against Mufti A.K.Hoosen  solely  on account of his stance of the Haqq  which has compelled him to brand all halaalized commercially-killed chickens HARAAM CARRION, then we warn SANHA of the perpetuation of this saga which will lead to more unsavoury exposures  with the consequence of more grey hairs for the Carrion Cabal.

   If the Carrion Cabal intransigently refuses to withdraw its silly and baatil letter of complaint from the non-Muslim  BCCSA forum, we shall then  soon deal with at least three other molvi members of SANHA's puppet 'ulama council' – members who have denuded themselves of all vestiges of shame and gratitude  which they owe to their Ustaadh, Mufti A.K.Hoosen. We shall name them and show to the Muslim community that they are unfaithful Kilaab who have deemed it proper to devour their Ustaadh. Furthermore, we warn them that as a direct consequence of them having conducted themselves as puppets  and rubber stamps for the Navlakhi-Lockhat Carrion Cabal, the epithet of khanaazeer, in the context employed by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), applies to them 100%. We trust that these molvi members – the Students of Mufti A.K.Hoosen – in SANHA's puppet 'ulama council', will understand the Ustaadh-Shaagird relationship, and  apply pressure on the Carrion Cabal to terminate its haraam, carrion  complaint against Mufti A.K.Hoosen. The  furthest latitude which is permitted to  the wayward Navlakhi-Lockhat conventicle is to submit to mediation by their own Ustaad whom they have elevated to the status of  Grand Mufti of South Africa. It is our dua that  Imaani sanity will prevail.

4 Rabiul Awwal 1435 – 6 January 2014

Last Updated on Friday, 07 February 2014 15:41  

Hijri Date











Moon Phase