plus minus gleich

Search our website

UUCSA NAME DISPUTE AND OUR BRIEF RESPONSE

E-mail Print PDF

27 Jamadal Ukhra 1438

26 March 2017

 

THE BAATIL UUCSA NAME DISPUTE AND OUR BRIEF RESPONSE TO THE KALB PATEL OF BAATIL BOGUS ‘UUCSA'

Re: the high court ruling

OUR DETAILED RESPONSE SHALL, INSHA-ALLAH, FOLLOW IN DUE COURSE

Kalb  Yusuf Patel, masquerading as the ‘secretary general’  of UUCSA, gloatingly  on the basis of  a kuffaar court ruling, which has no validity in the Shariah, has issued a statement in which he  has exaggerated the  findings of the kuffaar court. Since this is merely a very brief response to the Kalb’s  haraam propaganda on behalf of the NNB Jamiat  (NO NAME BRAND JAMIAT OF FORDSBURG), whose  illegitimate baby is BOGUS ‘uucsa’ whose objective is to make the Qur’aan and the Sunnah (The Shariah) subservient  and adaptable to the kufr  secular Constitution,  we shall herein confine ourselves to some salient facts for the edification and guidance of  those Muslims who are concerned with the Haqq of the Deen and who  understand the butlaan, fisq and fujoor the  NNB  Zindeeq crowd of moron molvis led by the murtad Reverend Abraham Bham who had sold his Imaan in a Christian church under the Christian cross.

The effect of the court’s ruling

1. The court did NOT decree that the Respondent (i.e. GENUINE UUCSA) is ‘fake’ as Kalb Patel gloatingly claims in his statement of baatil.

 

2. The mala fides argument is a technical rule which has legal application in terms of an Act  of Law, in this case the Trade Marks Act. It has no moral impact, least of all  in terms of the Shariah.

 

3.  The court  found that:


Download full article

Last Updated on Sunday, 26 March 2017 11:23  

Hijri Date











Moon Phase