“MUSLIMS” ARE NO LONGER MUSLIMS

Monday, May 25 2020 Written by Administrator  
Print

“MUSLIMS” ARE  NO LONGER MUSLIMS – THE ATHAAB ON THE UMMAH IS NOT SURPRISING


Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) said:“A time will dawn when the  people will gather intheir Musaajid and perform Salaat while not asingle one of them will be a Mu’min.”
The Musaajid in Germany and in many other countries  have opened, and  people (perhaps most of them are not Muslims) are again visiting the Musjids  where a host of  haraam, humiliating conditions has to be observed.


On Friday 22 May, 2020, during Jumuah, the Musjid in Berlin could  accommodate only 50 persons due to  the satanic  ‘social distancing’ regulation. A nearby church offered to accommodate the overflow. These  ostensible ‘Muslims’ went to the church where their  imaam led them in ‘jumuah salaat’. The imaam overjoyed  with his performance in the  church infront of the cross of shirk, commented:   “That is an amazing sign of solidarity in these times” said Mohamed Taha Sabry. This pandemic has made us a community. Crises bring people together”,  said the mosque’s imam, who led his congregation in prayer watched over by a stained-glass window depicting the Virgin mary.


Samer Hamdoun, one of the Muslim worshippers, said the church environment took some time to get used to. “It was a strange feeling because of the musical instruments, the pictures,” said Hamdoun.”(Reuters News Agency)The  shirk, kufr and  haraam environment  did not bother the ‘imaani’ conscience of these  worshippers because they  were all bereft of Imaan – the Imaan which is so vigorously emphasized hundreds of times  in the Qur’aan Majeed – the Imaan for which the Sahaabah and early Muslimeen  conquered the world, smashing the Roman and Persian empires.


The  hallucinated ‘solidarity’  overrides Imaan  for these worshippers who  derived pleasure in the environment of shirk, kufr and fisq. Their imaan, if ever they had Imaan, is dead. Their worship  and pleasure in the church of shirk deracinated their imaan if ever they had imaan. How can such people  still profess to me Muslims when they are  in entirety ignorant  or  repellant of the very basic and fundamental belief of Tauhid?  
There is nothing – absolutely nothing that is so repugnant and so abhorrent to Allah Azza Wa Jal as shirk. A church is the abode of shirk, and about shirk the Qur’aan Majeed says:     “Verily, Allah does not forgive shirk being committed with Him, and He forgives besides  shirk for whomever He wills.”     “Verily, the mushrikoon are najas.”      “It is not  permissible for the Nabi and the Mu’mineen to seek forgiveness (from Allah) for the Mushrikeen even if they are close relatives.”


The Qur’aan Majeed is replete with hundreds of Aayaat in condemnation of shirk.  The  doctrine of trinity,  the deification of  Nabi Isaa (Alayhis salaam) and Maryam (Alayhas salaam) are among the vilest  beliefs of  shirk condemned by Allah Ta’ala.  This cannot be hidden from any Muslim  who is a true Muslim. Severely rebuking the Christians, the Qur’aan majeed says:
“Verily,  those who said that Allah is Maseeh, the son of Maryam have committed kufr. Maseeh said: “O Bani Israaeel! Worship Allah, my Rabb and your Rabb. Verily,  whoever commits  shirk with Allah, (know that) verily, Allah has made haraam for him Jannat, and his abode is the Fire. And, for the oppressors (i.e. those who believe in trinity) there will be no helpers.    Verily,  those who said that Allah is trinity, they have committed kufr. There is no deity but Allah The One.    Maseeh, the son of Maryam is only a Messenger. Messengers have  gone before him. His mother was a Siddeeqah. Both of them used to eat food……..Those from Bani Israaeel who had committed kufr (with their  belief of shirk) have been cursed  by the tongues of Daawood and Isaa, the son of Maryam…”(Surah Al-Maaidah)


There are numerous Verses  castigating the Mushrikeen and condemning  the beliefs of the Christians, but today people who profess to be Muslims find ‘solace’ in the abodes of shirk. This deracination of Imaan is the consequence of socialization and fraternization in pursuit of the shaitaani concept of ‘solidarity’. What type of shaitaani ‘solidarity’ is it which deracinates Imaan?


This kind of solidarity was rejected by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) when the mushrikeen had  endeavoured to negotiate ‘peace’  with our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The Qur’aan Majeed vigorously  in hundreds of Aayaat denounces and debunks a ‘solidarity’ which compromises even one iota of Tauhid.
Insha-Allah a more fuller article elaborating on this La’nat shall be published.


30 Ramadhaan 1441 – 24 May 2020