Osama Bin Laden; Massive Deception

Tuesday, May 10 2011
User Rating: / 6

4 Jumadal Ukhra 1432 (9 May  2011)







(Ibraaheem, Aayat 46)


The date was 17 August 1988 when the Pakistan Air Force aircraft in which President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan was travelling, was destroyed by an act of sabotage  conspired by the U.S.A. who was not prepared to see Ziaul Haq aid the Afghan Mujahideen who had routed and expelled the Russians, to establish an Islamic government in Kabul. No autopsies and investigations were allowed.  Brigadier Mohammed Yusuf of the Pakistan army, stated: “A U.S. official was to announce that the bodies were not available for autopsy as Muslim custom requires burial  within 24 hours. While this is true in normal circumstances, it never applies within the Services, as shown by Army medical staff at Bahawalpur when they automatically made preparations to proceed.   ….So it was an act of mass murder (More than 31 people were murdered by this act of U.S. sabotage). ….Assistant Defence Secretary Richard Armitage justified the lack of any serious investigations into the sabotage by claiming, (“we were”) hopefully moving Pakistan in a more democratic manner…” The State Department did four things immediately after the crash which, taken together, point unerringly at a cover-up. First, within hours, it sent a  team of purely technical airforce advisers to assist the PAF Board of Inquiry. Secondly, it did not insist, through its embassy, on autopsies  on the bodies of the victims, particularly the crew, but rather allowed them to be buried knowing that essential evidence as to how the crash was caused was being buried with them. Thirdly, it sent a deputy National Security Adviser, Robert Oakley, to take over Raphel’s post. He could be relied on to sit on the lid of the can. Fourthly, and most importantly, it vetoed the FBI’s request to go to Pakistan. Oliver Revell, FBI’s Assistant had requested clearance and on 21 August had been given it verbally, but within hours, it had been withdrawn”

Regurgitating the same 24 hour deception, it is currently  reported:

“Pentagon officials said Monday that Bin Laden’s body was handled in accordance with Muslim traditions, which include strict rules on burial taking place 24 hours after death.” Sources confirmed to CBS News national security correspondent David Martin that his body was released into the sea from a U.S. Navy vessel on Monday, likely into the Indian Ocean.”

True to form, the U.S. Shaitaan and Arch-Terrorist, pretending to respect Islamic rites to conceal its barbarism, once again concocted its ’24-Hour’ Deception to cover up the evidence of its massive LIE and conspiracy. The 24-Hour conspiratorial stunt was presented to cover up and bury the evidence related to the US murder of President Ziaul Haq of Pakistan in 1988. Today this Master Plotter again resurrected the same 24-Hour Lie and Deception in its clumsy attempt to  bury or sink the evidence which would have exploded the myth of  the ‘capture and killing’ of Osama Bin Laden.

That Osama is dead, there is hardly any doubt. That he was captured and killed by US forces is a massive LIE which  even the baboons inhabiting  the Amazon jungle will reject with mirth and contempt. The much-advertized circumstances surrounding his alleged capture, killing and ‘burial’ at sea may be  swallowed by the U.S. public famous for its donkey mentality, but people of intelligence outrightly reject the brazenly conspicuous lies and stunts with which the US  is now vainly attempting to convince the world.

Either a  dead donkey was thrown into the sea for the mental consumption of a donkey public or no such mock sea burial ever took place. Who witnessed the event which in terms of western understanding is supposed to be a momentous occasion? What evidence is there that if any such alleged ‘burial’ occurred, it was Osama’s body? His alleged capture, the events during the confrontation, his killing, the area where he was allegedly captured and numerous other facts are all clouded with an illogical mystery which is unacceptable to people who possess rational brains.

If Osama was captured ‘alive’ as one version of  the murtad, Obama’s story goes, he would have been very unceremoniously and  with great fanfare and jubilation taken to America  where the US government would have extracted maximum publicity to  bolster the plummeting ratings of the murtad, Obama and his party of plotters. It would be the ideal scenario of the US conspirators to parade Osama at a mock trial in US courts where a system of jungle law reigns, in the same way as they had abducted Sister Aafiyah from Afghanistan, tortured her brutally, put her on a mock and farcical trial in a US kangaroo court where the US jungle judge refused to listen to her testimony, then sentenced her to spend her life in a US dungeon.


(1)    The BBC News reported:  “The US military took this requirement (of burying as soon as possible according to Islamic tradition) seriously, burying the body within hours. Religious rites were carried on the deck of a US aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson. The body, shrouded in a white sheet and placed in a weighted bag, was then placed on a flat board, tipped up, and eased into the Arabian Sea.

This occurred at 0600GMT, approximately 12 hours after the fire fight during which Osama Bin Laden was shot in the head. After this first shot, he was shot again, to make sure that he was dead. The body was then flown to Afghanistan and Bin Laden’s identity was confirmed.

The US  has also claimed that no one in the Muslim world was prepared to accept the body of Osama. Both claims are blatant lies. The one report released by US authorities say that the body was dumped in the Arabian sea. The other report states the Indian Ocean. Almost the entire Muslim world  would have been prepared to accept his body. But the US could make no such request because there simply was no  body of Osama. Osama had died  years ago and was buried in some unmarked grave in Afghanistan as is the normal practice for burying the Shuhada (Martyrs) in Afghanistan.

(2)  The US claims that Osama was captured after a ‘fire fight’. He was shot once, then again a second time to ‘ensure’ he was dead. The 12 year old daughter of Osama has allegedly said that she was present went her unarmed father was killed by US forces. The Daily News of Pakistan contradicting the US claim that its ‘Seals’ had tried to capture Osama alive, but killed him when he resisted, said that US forces killed Osama within the first few minutes of the midnight operation. The US, however, has also said that Osama was ‘unarmed’. Yet they have no clear explanation why he was ‘killed’ when he was unarmed.

So many lies have emanated from the US government, that amendments were being made to the original story within hours. There is not a stitch of evidence to prove that a raid had taken place on the alleged hideout of Osama in  the military cantonment ‘city’ of Abbotabad.

(3)  The alleged hideout is located inside a Pakistani military cantonment. It is a virtual military barracks. The ‘hideout’ house was in close proximity to Pakistan’s  top military academy. The place teems with military personnel, army generals, etc. . The design of the supposed ‘hideout’ was not different from numerous houses in Abbottabad, including the high walls and barbed wire.  How was is possible for the world’s most wanted man with a $25 million award on his head to have lived and concealed himself for a decade in the heart of Pakistan’s elite military barracks without the huge US, and Pakistan’s ISI and the  many other security establishment having the faintest  idea?

(4)   A reporter in London wrote:  “Almost as strange as the location of Bin Laden’s final sanctuary was the scant evidence of fighting during the raid. The house appears untouched by violence. A cypress and a maple grow in the garden, but not a leaf out of place. Beyond the compound walls potatoes and cabbages spring from allotment fields uncrushed by soldiers’ boots. Dagga plants burst from the verges in reckless abandon, adding to the sense of bucolic tranquillity. From the outside at least, the aftermath of the historic struggle in house 254 appears chronically underwhelming and quite uncanny.”

These facts - the lies emanating from America, the surreptitious dumping  or alleged dumping of a ‘donkey’s’ body into an unknown sea so secretively, leaving no evidence whatsoever of the world’s most hunted, most dangerous ‘terrorist’, to soothe the  palates of a public with donkey mentality in the US, and the  glaring  discrepancies, all  indicate that there was no raid  by the American cowboys, and no Bin Laden at House No.254. It is inconceivable that a man wanted so much as Osama, could ever have been  at the most inconceivable place.

Dr.Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s term, and also an editor of the Wall Street Journal, writes about the alleged raid: “No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed Bin Laden, in the absence of a fire fight, was murdered by the SEALS with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden”, the operation can only appear to be the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?”

Debunking the palpably false story of the U.S.A., Dr.Craig says: “The White House has also had to abandon the story that President Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the Seals’ helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no fire fight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a fire fight. Another reason  the story had to be abandoned is that if the event  was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theatre, there would be no video.”

“The fire fight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against al-Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the planet.”    Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war”. But there was no fire fight, so where did  “the fog of war” come from?”

Continuing, Dr.Paul Craig says: “When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require  fundamental alterations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans……..Who can believe that the US would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The government’s story is not believable that the government dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released someday.”

Another self-contradiction by Obama is his claim that the reason for not releasing the photos of the ‘killed’ Osama was that it is too ‘gruesome’ and that it would be inflammatory to release it. Yet Obama first claimed that Bin Laden was killed by a single shot in his head. How did single bullet render the ‘corpse gruesome’ to prevent its publication  - a publication which would give credence to the American story? Writing in the Herald, reporter Stephen Collinson says:  “Obama will be aware that the publication of a picture of a dead Bin Laden would lay to rest any conspiracy theories in the wider world that Washington somehow faked his killing.  ….US enemies are already beginning to cast doubt on Washington’s word, questioning Bin Laden’s death for propaganda purposes.”

Since there was no dead Bin Laden, Obama could not publish a picture of his corpse.

What then is the dark motive of  the US for having resurrected Bin Laden in this childish manner conspicuous for its puerility, clumsiness and incompetency? They (the US plotters) were just as childish and stupid when they perpetrated the massive treachery of blowing up their own World Trade Centre and laying the blame on Osama who was living in the mountains of Afghanistan. The vile  agenda was to  create justification for the invasion of Afghanistan.

The sinister agenda  underlying the clumsy resurrection of Bin Laden is almost certainly to give Obama’s  plunging ratings a massive injection of donkey-public support. Fearing defeat in the forthcoming elections, Obama and his clique of pirates  were desperate for something spectacular. They are fully aware that Osama had died years ago, hence they felt confident to manipulate his death in order to resurrect him in pursuance of their sinister objective. But, the plot was executed too clumsily. The veneer is too thin and cannot conceal the muck and the fraud. Even the CIA had several years ago said that they  “had managed to get the names of some of the medications bin Laden is taking” and they concluded that he was dying of kidney failure.

It is inconceivable that Osama was hiding inside the headquarters of Pakistan’s military organization, a 100 metres from Pakistan’s top military academy, without the military and the intelligence agency being aware thereof. Besides the local intelligence agencies, the place is also covered by the CIA, FBI and other murky outfits such as the U.S.A.’s mercenary  murderers, e.g. Blackwater, etc.

If the Pakistani intelligence agency which works closely with its US counterparts had   captured  Osama and  was detaining  him, then too, it is not at all feasible to believe that they would keep him in an unguarded house in the elite military area of Abbottabad. It is also highly improbable that the ISI was playing a double game, protecting Osama right  within their midst so flagrantly. There is no dearth of American black torture centres in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere where Osama would have been shipped to.

The question remains: Why did the US and Pakistan select the military cantonment area for the fake raid. The simple answer is: They just had no other safe place for staging a fake operation. The military personnel in the cantonment could be relied on to maintain silence whereas in any other area, the people would speak up and inform that there was no such raid in their locality. The US claims that a helicopter carrying its stupid SEALS landed in the backyard of the house, and after the ‘raid’ the US team, before departing detonated and destroyed the helicopter. All  of this rubbish happening in the army barracks without the military, intelligence agencies and others having the slightest awareness. The lies are too clumsy and too contradictory to believe anything that emanates from the US government and the security agencies of  Napakistan (the Impure Land  of treachery and traitors).

The preposterousness of this saga of deceit and deception  prompted a  businessman, Jehangir Khan who is a close neighbour of house No.254, the alleged ‘hideout house’, to say: “He just could not have lived here among us. Its impossible. He was a huge man hunted by the world.  Why would he have chosen to live here, in a military restricted area, so close to the academy and to so many barracks, without proper security detail of his own?”

Commenting on these questions, Anthony Loyd a reporter in London writes: “These  are the questions now haunting Pakistan’s government and intelligence agencies. Despite top-level denials of collusion in giving sanctuary to al-Qaeda’s founder, the country’s authorities are nevertheless struggling to explain how the terrorist chief and mass murderer lived unmolested alongside the stalwarts of their security establishment.  Many Pakistanis have simply elected to disbelieve that Bin Laden had lived and died among them.”

A local ‘anti-terrorist’ commando on a nearby rooftop commented: “I can’t believe that he was here.” Police officers, government officials and the people in general all reject the idea that Osama was living in house No.254, that there had been a raid and that he was killed there.

The house resembles many other houses in the areas and is quite different from the ‘reinforced stronghold’ described by the US liars in Washington.

It was also claimed about the house:  “That gate remained closed almost 24 hours a day. Just occasionally I used to see  one man come out, driving a car with tinted windows. We heard that the family who owned it were involved in a feud with another tribe near Peshawar, and had come here to escape. It explained how careful and hidden they were.”

Another person said: “Two more vehicles, a Toyota Corolla and a minibus, sometimes emerging from the green gates. The people within remained more or less hermetically sealed from the community around them. The men never prayed with us or shared any celebration or worry. They bought their supplies elsewhere.”

This furtive setting and aura of intrigue enveloping house 254 were the perfect ingredients to attract the attention of the security  and military apparatus. It is inconceivable that despite all the suspicion surrounding the house with the logical consequences of rumour and gossip which generally accompany this type of scenario, the intelligence agencies of  Pakistan and  the U.S.A. and the military under whose nose Osama allegedly lived for a decade and conducted  his so-called ‘international terrorism’ activities,  had remained blissfully ignorant and unaware.  It is pure lies compounded with more lies. How is it ever possible to believe what Pakistan’s  Intelligence officers are now saying, namely:  “The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency had no idea Bin Laden was holed up here despite having searched the compound of house 254 in 2003.”  In addition to the baboon and donkeys in the U.S.A., there are numerous similar asses and baboons  in Pakistan as well. Perhaps, and it is a remote possibility, that the donkeys and apes of Napakistan may swallow this rubbish explanation. Even the senior counter-terrorism official in the U.S.A. commented  that it was “inconceivable” that Osama had lived in that house without enjoying “support network” in Pakistan. Yes, that is so if Osama was in fact living there. But high profile brains are not a requisite for dismissing the Lie of the century – a lie just as stupendous as the lie that Osama had engineered the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:03