THE BASELESS LAMENT OF DARUSH SHAITAAN
In its hollow and self-vindictive lament, captioned Differing with Respect, the so-called Darul Ihsan (Darush Shaitaan in reality) deviate molvis attempt to mislead and hoodwick unwary and ignorant Muslims by portraying the criticism and condemnation directed at it to be the effect of pride. This lament is a regurgitation of the same article which this entity had published in 2018.
By cunning, the attempt is to convey the idea that all their haraam indulgences come within the parameters of valid Shar’i academic Ikhtilaaf (Difference of Opinion). While the deviates of Darush Shaitaan, condemn the justified Shar’i criticism, they crave for Muslims to accept that their haraam acts and activities are within the framework of the Shariah. Thus, these juhala say in their out-dated lament:
“…..our Deen allows for academic differences of opinion regarding laws and rulings as long as these are within the required parameters.”
The haraam indulgences of Darush Shaitaan and of others of similar ilk, do not come within the purview of “academic differences” which are acceptable and which no one but morons criticize. Darush Shaitaan has been criticized for its indulgence in fisq and blatant haraam acts. Fisq and haraam do not come within the parameters of valid academic differences.
Darush Shaitaan was among the foremost fussaaq who had supported the closure of the Musaajid, devil’s social distance in the Musaajid, suspension of Jumuah Salaat, etc. Some of its evil, haraam indulgences are:
- Suspension of Jumua Salaat.
- Closure of the Musaajid
- Active support for the haraam covid protocols
- Ramadhaan Youth Night
- Zubair Bhayat feasted and made merry at a function where he sat at the table with faasiqah females. He was condemned for this haraam.
- Encourages Muslim females to enter the brothel university institutes.
- The molvi indulges in television, thus forfeiting his khilaafat.
- Encouraging Muslims, even females, to register as voters for participation in kuffaar politics. The entire process entails indulgence in haraam, the worst is for Muslim females to expose themselves to manhandling by kuffaar males.
- Promoting kuffaar political slogans such as ‘ubuntu’ and ‘empowerment’.
- Promoting haraam sports.
These are some of its haraam indulgences which never come within the scope of valid academic differences. On the contrary, these indulgences are blatantly haraam. Condemnation of haraam acts, fisq and fujoor belongs to the domain of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahyi Anil Munkar. This command may not be abandoned.
The need to condemn these criminals publicly and harshly is constrained by their promoting haraam to be halaal. This evil entity is a destructive poison in the Muslim community. It is scandalously modernistic in its attitude and methodology. There is nothing of the Sunnah being portrayed by Darush Shaitaan, and how can it ever stand for the Sunnah when it is an agent of Shaitaan?
Darush Shaitaan and all similar outfits whose primary objective is monetary gain under Deeni cover must be severely condemned. The differences with them do not pertain to academic issues. They are being excoriated for their fisq, fujoor and deception. Do not be duped by the smokescreen of ‘academic differences’.
The criticism against Darush Shaitaan comes within the scope of the Qur’aanic Aayat:
“In fact, We strike baatil with Haqq, then it (Haqq) smashes out its brains.”
15 Zul Hajj 1444 – 4 July 2023