AL-HAQ
4 Muharram 1447
30 June 2025
THE IRAN-ISRAEL WAR MUNAAFIQEEN PEDDLING A MAMMOTH LIE
A chap, Mr. Saleam Essop, in his rude, haraam interruption during the Jumuah Khutbah at a Musalla, averred:
“Iran and Yemen – two nations often slandered for their Shiite majority – were among the few that stood unwaveringly with Palestine, while the rest of the 2 billion Muslims in the world remained mostly spectators.”
Mr. Essop has not expanded his allegation of ‘slander’. What are the facts of the ‘slander’ he has alleged? On the contrary, he has slandered the 2 billion Muslims of the Ahlus Sunnah. This slander directed to the Ahlus Sunnah has become a common refrain. Modernists, pro-Shiahs and Shiahs accuse the Ahlus Sunnah, i.e. Muslims – the 2 billion Muslims – of standing as silent spectators while the Shiahs of Iran and Yemen had actively supported Palestine. This claim is pure slander by those who harbour a deep and concealed hatred for Islam – the original Islam – the Islam of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah.
What did Mr.Essop do for Palestine? It will be fair to assume that he too was among the “2 billion Muslims” who remained ‘idle spectators’. The truth is that what Mr.Essop and his ilk are alleging about the Ahlus Sunnah being ‘silent spectators’ is a huge LIE – a slander rising from a Shiah heart darkened by animosity and malice for the Ahlus Sunnah.
Iran and Palestine are in desperate need of military support. From an Islamic perspective, Iran has to be supported militarily despite it being an established kufr Shiah state. Notwithstanding the abhorrent kufr beliefs of the Shiahs, it does devolve on Muslims states as a duty to militarily aid Iran.
As far as the Yahood and Nasaara are concerned, Iran is a Muslim state. The plot of the Yahood and Nasaara is to destabilize and eliminate the World of Islam. In this regard, they have achieved considerable success in Libya, Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, etc. A Yahoodi-Nasaara victory in Iran, brings Pakistan into the focus for destruction. Pakistan is next in line in the plot of the West. It is therefore imperative for Muslim states to militarily aid Iran.
However, the huge and intractable problem and reality are that today all the Muslim countries are under the sway of kuffaar regimes masquerading as Muslims. Not a single one of these regimes with their armies had lifted a finger to militarily aid the Muslims of Gazzah who were being and are being incessantly massacred on a daily basis. Gazzah is a killing field where the Yahood and Nasaara are conducting the worst kind of genocide. While these regimes have been silent spectators, in fact collaborators with the Yahood and Nasaara, their treachery may not be proclaimed as the crime of the 2 billion Muslims.
According to Mr.Essop, only Iran and Yemen had ‘unwaveringly stood with Palestine”. This is false. While the Houtis had fired some missiles, Iran’s support was only verbal proclamations. The one occasion that Iran had fired a volley of crackers at Israel was because the latter had violated its sovereignty by murdering Palestinian and Iranian leaders in Iran. Iran has actively abstained from providing military support to Hamas throughout these 20 months of daily brutal massacres and destruction of the entire country.
So, while Iran has ‘unwaveringly stood with Palestine’, its stance was and is mere verbal support. On the other hand, the regimes of the Muslim countries are not Muslim. Aid is not to be expected from them. It is an egregious error to understand that these regimes are within the fold of the 2 billion Muslims who constitute the Ahlus Sunnah Ummah of Islam. On the contrary, all of these regimes are in cahoots with Israel, and that applies to even Turkey.
The cowardice and treachery of these kufr regimes masquerading as Muslims, should not be extended to the Ahlus Sunnah masses comprising the 2 billion Muslims. The 2 billion Muslims – the vast majority – have not been silent spectators. Condemning and criticizing the Yahood and Nasaara, making fervent Dua for the oppressed Palestinians and providing financial aid and the like have been the contributions of the 2 billion Muslims of the Ahlus Sunnah. The capability of the unfortunate 2 billion Muslims does not extend beyond the ambit of these humble contributions. And, this is the decree of Allah Azza Wa Jala Who has imposed the domination of kuffaar regimes on the Muslim Ummah to punish it for its most abhorrent indulgence in fisq, fujoor and kufr. After all, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) warned us: “Your deeds are your rulers.”
Thus, the 2 billion Muslims wallowing in gross transgression and treachery lack the capability of firing missiles and flattening the Yahood and Nasaara. Notwithstanding this impotency, it is egregiously erroneous and in fact a slander to accuse the 2 billion Muslims of the Sunnah of being silent spectators. They are not. They cry and their hearts bleed. They are grief-stricken due to their impotency.
The people in the street – the masses – have no other means at their disposal for aiding Palestine. Military aid is possible only by armies and airforces which all the so-called ‘Muslim’ regimes possess. While they possess military might, they are bereft of Imaan, hence they are complicit with Israel and America in the plot of genocide being enacted in Palestine.
Does Mr.Essop expect the masses consisting of farmers, traders and labourers to fire missiles into Israel? Why did Mr.Essop not fire missiles into Israel? Why does he not emulate the Houtis and his Shiah brothers? Why was he a silent spectator? It is indeed a great lie being peddled that the 2 billion Muslims stood aside as idle spectators doing nothing to support Palestine. They support Palestine in whichever way they are able to provide assistance. Some ignoramuses support Palestine with even stupid haraam ways and projects. The masses have no missiles to fire into Israel. We are certain that if Mr.Essop can provide the 2 billion Muslims of the Ahlus Sunnah with missiles, the kind Iran has, then he will have a different opinion of the Ahlus Sunnah. The claim he and his ilk peddle is therefore bunkum – a despicable LIE. Iran did not fire missiles to aid Palestine. Iran fired missiles to defend itself after Israel had struck.
The attitude of treachery and complicity of the regimes in the Muslim countries should not be confused and understood as being the stance of the 2 billion Muslims. The stance of the 2 billion Muslims is to provide such support which they are capable of. The regimes are all kuffaar just as are the Shiah, while the 2 billion Muslims are genuine Muslims.
Military support for Iran, which is not forthcoming from the kuffaar regimes in Muslim countries, should not be interpreted to mean that the 2 billion Muslims are silent spectators. The attitude and complicity of the kuffaar regimes should not be conflated with the attitude of the 2 billion Muslims. Should we assume that some Muslim country, e.g. Pakistan, constrained by circumstances militarily comes to the aid of Iran, then it may not be confused with support for the Shiah religion nor may such support constitute a basis for unity with Shiahs.
Pakistan has warned Israel against the use of nuclear bombs against Iran. If Israel resorts to nuclear weapons, Pakistan has threatened to also strike Israel with nuclear weapons. Should such a threat materialize, it shall not be interpreted as unity with Shiahs. It will merely be a symbiotic unity beneficial for both countries having a common foe.
While the impotency of the 2 billion Muslims is lamentable and heart-rending it is not at all surprising. Predicting this miserable state of affairs, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had said:
“Soon will the (kuffaar) nations form coalitions to devour you.” Someone said: ‘Will it be because we shall be few in number on that day?’ Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “In fact on that day you will be abundant. But you will be GHUTHA (Rubbish) such as the flotsam of floodwaters. Allah Ta’ala will eliminate fear for you from the hearts of your enemy, and He will cast wahan in your hearts.” Someone asked: ‘O Rasulullah! What is wahan?’ Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: ‘Love of the world and an aversion for death”
This is the state of the 2 billion Muslims of this era. The effect of love for the dunya and aversion for Maut is fear for the kuffaar. Thus kuffaar domination is the consequence of this Wahan in the 2 billion Muslims.
Shiahs are Disbelievers (Kuffaar)
Mr.Essop alleges:
“But to my shock, I walked into yet another musallah and heard a near copy-cat lecture – again singling out Shiites, again drawing lines of “us versus them”, even edging toward branding them disbelievers.”
In fact they are disbelievers. Either Mr.Essop is a Shiah or a Shiah supporter or a chap of appalling ignorance. The criticism of Shiah beliefs is unrelated to the Iran-Israel war. Due to propaganda by Shiahs and their modernist well-wishers in the Muslim community, a need has developed for educating the ignorant Muslim public regarding the abhorrent kufr beliefs of the Shiahs. This need is constrained by the imperative need to protect the Imaan of Muslims. It is vital for Muslims to understand that Shiahs are not Muslims. There is no common ground in Belief for uniting with Shiahs. This incumbent disunity does not impact negatively on military aid for a Shiah state being attacked by the Yahood and Nasaara. If any Muslim state militarily aids Iran, the 2 billion Muslims will have no objection.
It is essential to separate the two issues and to avoid confusion. The one issue is the kufr of the Shiah religion, and the other issue is military aid for Iran. The 2 billion Muslims – the ordinary folk – lack this kind of aid. The 2 billion Muslims, due to their treachery against Allah Azza Wa Jal, are militarily impotent. This impotence is part of the Athaab. It is chastisement by Allah Ta’ala for their treachery, and this includes the Palestinian Muslims who are being subjected to Divine Wrath for having abandoned the Shariah.
The Mimbar and ‘fitnah’
In his disrespectful and abhorrent outburst during the Jumuah proceedings, Mr.Essop said: “Do not use the mimbar to spread fitnah. The Prophet (peace be upon him) never taught us to divide – he taught is to unite, to uphold justice, and to stand with the oppressed.”
In fact, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) taught us to divide – to disunite on the platform of Haqq. He taught us to shun baatil, falsehood and kufr. Unity with kufr is haraam.
The reality cannot be dismissed by such emotional remarks devoid of substance. Informing Muslims of the Haq – of the true beliefs of Islam and of the corrupt beliefs of Shi’ism – is not fitnah. The averment of fitnah by Mr.Essop is akin to the charge of ‘fitnah’ which the mushrikeen directed to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) when he unfurled the Standard of Tauheed and used the ‘mimbar’ to decry and denounce the beliefs and idols of the mushrikeen. They accused our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) of disunity, of breaking up families with his Message of Tauheed.
It has become fashionable in this era to level the charge of fitnah and creating disunity whenever the Haq is propounded and the true teachings of Islam are disseminated. The title of the Qur’aan is Furqaan (The Splitter – The Entity which distinguishes between Haqq and baatil). The first being in Islam who had caused disunity was Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). His Message of Tauheed disunited tribes and families. Father and son became opponents on the basis of the Message of Tauheed.
While unity can be sacrificed and abandoned, the true Beliefs of Islam can never be compromised by striking up a dalliance with the those who deny the true Beliefs of the Ahlus Sunnah. Disunity on the pivot of Haqq is in fact ibaadat commanded by Allah Ta’ala. Thus, ‘drawing the lines’ between Haqq and baatil – Truth and falsehood – Islam and kufr is an imperative command of Islam. The argument of Mr.Essop for creating unity with Shiahs is palpably baseless and haraam.
The mimbar was being used to spread the truth of Islamic Aqaa-id and the falsehood of Shiah beliefs. This is never fitnah. This is precisely what Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) taught us and this was what he used to propagate. He taught us to create division on the basis of the Haqq.
Yes, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) taught us to ‘stand with the oppressed’. But standing with the oppressed is not acceptance of corrupt beliefs of kufr. It is not to sweep the Haqq under the carpet with a view to accommodate the baatil of Shi’ism. On what basis does Mr.Essop believe that proclamation of the falsehood of Shi’ism equates to abstention from standing with the oppressed? In which way was the security of Iran threatened by the Molvi who had elaborated the Shiah beliefs from the mimbar? The discussion did not pertain to the war. The topic was the kufr of Shi’ism. Mr.Essop either intentionally or ignorantly conflates the two separate issues. This conflation is deception.
Mr.Essop says that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) “taught us to unite”. Why did Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) not unite with the mushrikeen? Why did he create disunity with them? Because Haqq and baatil which are opposites cannot unite and subsist in the same substratum.
In his stupid outburst, Mr.Essop said: “I am non-sectarian. I do not stand with any label, only with truth and justice, as our religion commands.”
Even deviates and blasphemers ‘stand with a label’. His flapdoodle utterance is pure bunkum. The very first one to attach a label to Muslims was Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). It was our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) who had said that his Ummah will split into 73 sects, and only one sect, the Ahlus Sunnah, will be in Jannat while the rest of the 72 sects will be in the Fire. It is clear that Mr.Essop is under the umbrella of the sects of the Fire. All those who are not sectarian or members of the Sect of the Sunnah, belong to the sects of the Fire.
It is egregiously stupid to claim that one is not sectarian despite adhering to the beliefs of a sect. What are Mr.Essop’s beliefs? What is his idea of ‘truth’. What does our religion command? It definitely does not command unification with falsehood and kufr. The label of kufr befits Mr.Essop for having displayed his strong bias for Shi’ism.
Adding to his pedantry, Mr.Essop averred: “I reminded them that the Prophet (peace be upon him) was instructed by Allah not to align with any sect, and yet they proudly proclaim themselves ‘Sunnis’…”
Mr.Essop has not spelled out the ‘instruction’ which he has mentioned. What was that instruction? Mr.Essop has merely portrayed his ignorance with his nonsensical statement. There is no such instruction. The instruction is not to align with baatil and kufr. Shi’ism is kufr and baatil, hence it comes within the purview of the ‘instruction’ mentioned by the fellow.
As for the title of ‘Sunnis’, this is the label given to Muslims by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). It was our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) who had said that the Saved Sect comprise those who follow his Sunnah and the Sunnah of his Sahaabah. Followers of the Sunnah are thus described as ‘Sunnis’.
While the chap displays umbrage for the Sunni label, he has no qualms about the Shiite label. On the contrary, he defends those who have attached the label of Shiah to themselves. This moron, while condemning sectarianism, has no word of criticism for the Shiah sect which consists of those who are virulently aligned against the Ummah of Islam. They are not of Islam – the Islam we follow. Instead of accusing the Ahlus Sunnah of ‘betraying the prophetic mission’, he should advise his Shiah brethren to desist from betraying Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Even a cursory glance at the theological works of the Shiahs will confirm their appalling state of treachery and betrayal of the ‘Prophetic Mission’.
Mr.Essop, despite his attempt to conceal his true sectarianism has by his stupid outburst Shiah exposed his Shiah leanings or actual Shi’ism. He is simply one of those Taqiyah Shiahs.