RAGIE’S BASELESS IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION OF A MISREPRESENTATION
In a futile attempt to extricate himself from the Shi’i mess of his Eid talk, Zahier Ragie says:
“For the benefit of those sincerely seeking the truth, the reference I cited in my talk was specifically regarding a future event. What was mentioned is a transmission about what will occur under the divinely guided leadership of the real Imaam Mahdi—
(in accordance with the creed of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamā‘ah) and not a call for current ideological or theological compromise.”
This ziz zagging interpretation which he gives to his own subtle misrepresentation of Islam in an attempt to hoodwink ignorant Muslims into a baseless and false understanding regarding Shi’ism does not clarify the misconception he was subtly promoting in his Eid talk.
Firstly, what was the imperative need for this character to even make reference to Muslim-Shiah differences and their supposed reconciliation under the banner of Imaam Mahdi (Alayhis salaam)? What was the motivating factor which had prompted Ragie to even touch on the subject?
During this current war on Iran waged by the Yahood and Nasaara or more appropriately by the western atheists, even the staunchest and most virulent Muslim critics of Shiahs have stated their sympathy with Iran and are hoping for Iran to emerge victorious. So what has impelled this dubious character to even introduce the topic of Muslim-Shiah conflict at this juncture?
The reality – the true sinister motive is the promotion of Shi’ism or at the minimum, accommodation of the Shiah religion. Taking advantage of Muslim sympathy for Iran due to the brutal aggression of the USA and Israel, Ragie perceived this juncture as an opportune time for subtle injection of toleration for the Shiah religion. His denial of this motive is palpably false.
When will Imaam Mahdi (Alayhis salaam) make his appearance? It may be now or after centuries. Allah Ta’ala Alone knows. There was no need for Ragie to even have introduced Imaam Mahdi (Alayhis salaam) in his stupid, false discourse. The manner in which he presented his theme of imaginary ‘unification’ conspicuously minimizes the imperative importance of the Aqeedah of Islam. Thus, saying ‘irrespective of what your beliefs are’ is an inspiration of Iblees. Everything for Muslims is based on correct Belief – the only one and true Aqeedah of Islam. There is no other belief.
Any person who has any hope of being under the banner of Islam, the banner of Imaam Mahdi, will understand the falsity of his own beliefs and ideas, abandon them, embrace Islam and enter under the Umbrella of Imaam Mahdi (Alayhis salaam).
The jaahil further says: “This is not a time to bring about the sectarian differences between Shiah and Sunni. Lean back to your fitrah and start supporting justice. Stand with the oppressed….”
Who has brought up Muslim-Shiah differences presently during this war? It is this chap, Ragie and other juhala, zindeeq modernists who are digging up the differences. If the morons do not open their mouths to excrete rubbish, there will be silence from those who out rightly reject Shi’ism and who believe Shiahs are kuffaar. We did not bring about discussion regarding differences. On the contrary we had express unequivocal sympathy for Iran in the present conflagration. So what exactly prompts these ghutha zanaadaqah to embark on the subject of Muslim-Shiah differences? The subtle and pernicious motive is to promote Shi’ism, and for this objective the aggression on Iran is being satanically manipulated by these juhala.
Ragie has not been misrepresented. He has not been cited out of context. His self-vindictive acquittal is an exercise for exonerating himself and extricating himself from the mess of his baatil.
12 Shawwaal 1447 – 1 April 2026