SANHA SPRAWLING IN THE CARRION GUTTER
‘THE HALAAL CERTIFYING BODIES ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED.” (Mufti A.K.Hoosein)
In response to a brother who sought the Shariah’s ruling pertaining to the chickens which SANHA and the gamut of carrion bodies halaalize, Mufti A.K.Hoosein said:
(d) Maulana Ansaari (rahmatullah alayh) and Maulana A.H.Omarjee (rahmatullah alayh) had committed a colossal error in their acceptance of such a glaringly haraam satanic system of slaughter. They had erred by favouring the kuffaar business entrepreneurs and by harming the Imaan and ruining the Akhlaaq of the Ummah with the blunder of issuing a halaal certificate to Rainbow. Their error of judgment was a great disservice to the Muslim community, and it was the basis on which the unscrupulous fussaaq and fujjaar of SANHA has erected their carrion empire.
Another unknown fact is that Maulana Ansaari despite being signatory to Rainbow’s ‘halaal’ certificate was in conflict with Maulana Omarjee. At times there were sharp differences between these two seniors on the Rainbow issue. At one informal meeting between these two Ulama, the temperature somewhat rose to produce an intemperate climate with talk of withdrawing Rainbow’s haraam ‘halaal’ certificate which the then Jamiatul Ulama of Natal had issued. That was a time when the miserable SANHA characters were still soiling their napkins.
Be this as it may. The Shar’i reality is that the massive error/blunder committed by the Jamiatul Ulama Natal in the 1970’s with its halaal certificate for Rainbow was a huge disservice to Muslims. There is no support for SANHA in this blunder. A blunder added to a blunder does not rectify the carrion issue. Carrion remains carrion.
The mention of the names of these two senior Ulama by SANHA is a red herring miscalculated to deflect the minds of Muslims. In mentioning these names, SANHA has not responded to the charges levelled by Mufti A.K.Hoosein who had made his declaration on the basis of facts which have hitherto not been rationally challenged and refuted.
(e) As far as Moulana Sema (rahmatullah alayh) was concerned, he only tagged along. He had implicit trust in the other two seniors of the Jamiat. Whatever they said, was final. Maulana Sema was largely cut off from the Jamiat’s day to day affairs, and had no reliable connection with the Rainbow carrion plant. Furthermore, even if he had actively condoned the Jamiat’s blunder, the carrion saga is not rectified thereby. It too was a regrettable error committed by a senior who did not apply his attention to the huge danger of halaalizing the killed chickens of kuffaar plants. Also, Maulana Sema’s role does not answer the grounds for hurmat presented by Mufti A.K.Hoosein.
(f) The attribution of endorsement of Rainbow carrion by Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi, Mufti Basheer Sanjalvi and Mufti Ahmed Mia (rahmatullah alayhim) is a rotten, carrion, blantant LIE disgorged by the carrion-drunk SANHA. We say without fear of contradiction that these three Ulama of the then Jamiatul Ulama of Transvaal did not condone nor accepted Rainbow Chickens to be halaal.
In fact, the joint inspection of Rainbow conducted by Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal and Jamiatul Ulama Natal during the 70’s was the effect of the conflict. The Jamiat of Transvaal had not accepted the so-called halaal status of Rainbow. In order to get the Transvaal Jamiat on to the ‘halaal’ bandwagon thereby eliminating the conflict, Maulana Omarjee had organized the inspection. At that inspection Hadhrat Maulana Yusuf Binnuri (rahmatullah alayh) was also present.
This account of the inspection is provided by an eye witness who had also participated in the inspection at the time when Navlakhi and Lockhat were still soiling their napkins. Hadhrat Maulana Yusuf Binnuri (rahmatullah alayh) had adopted an extremely lackadaisical attitude on the inspection. He glanced superficially at the process and at the end when Maulana Omarjee asked his opinion, he only said: “You people must supervise the plant properly.”
As far as the three Ulama of Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal (Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi, Mufti Basheer Sanjalvi and Mufti Ahmed Mia) were concerned, they had NOT accepted the so-called ‘halaal’ status of Rainbow chickens. SANHA is guilty of a blatant lie for creating the false impression that these Ulama had accepted and condoned Rainbow’s system and the so-called ‘halaal’ status of the carrion Rainbow was and is producing.
The dissatisfaction of Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi was not limited to such Shar’i issues which the shayaateen of SANHA believe to be peripheral and insignificant, despite their vital importance. Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi noted carefully that the very fundamental of the severance of the requisite neck vessels for the hillat of the chickens was not being complied with. After observing many chickens being subjected to the killing system known as Shareetatush Shaitaan, Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi, took one of the killed chickens from the line and paraded it to all and sundry to prove that the requisite neck vessels were not cut. A nip in the neck left the jugular vein intact. Mufti Sanjalvi walked the length of the plant showing us the incorrect cutting of the neck. Thus, there was absolutely no support forthcoming from the Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal for the halaalization of Rainbow by the Natal Jamiat. Today the carrion chickens have come home to roost in the form of SANHA, the Carrion Halaalizer.
Those who halaalize carrion and torture billions of Allah’s creatures are incorrigible liars. It is for this reason that SANHA has attributed blatant and brazen lies to the Ulama of Jamiatul Ulama Transvaal, i.e. the then Jamiat under the able leadership of Mufti Ebrahim Sanjalvi.
100% HARAAM CARRION CHICKENS
To be continued, Insha-Allah
30 Rabiul-Awwaal 1445 – 16 October 2023