THE KNB (KUFR ‘NIKAH’ BILL) OF AL JAMA PARTY
OUR RESPONSE TO ADVOCATE M.S.SALEEM KHAN
Canvassing on behalf of Al Jama Party, Advocate M.S.Khan of Durban urges Muslims to support the Kufr Bill of Al Jama Party. It is clear that neither Mr.Ganief Hendricks of Al Jama Party nor Adv.M.S.Khan has a valid understanding of the Shariah. Anyone who understands the meaning of dilution of the Shariah or contamination of the Shariah, will know that such dilution/contamination is in fact KUFR – kufr which expels the proponent from the fold of Islam.
For the edification and safety of the Imaan of the aforementioned two gentlemen who are obviously modernists and liberals lacking in the requisite qualifications of Deeni Knowledge for allowing them to voice themselves on Shar’i issues, our advice is that they refrain from venturing into a domain for which they are not qualified.
The bill fielded by Mr.Hendricks is KUFR. The Shariah of Islam is Divine. It is an immiscible Institution which is the product of Wahi. The immitigability of Allah’s Shariah which is advocated by Mr.Khan is totally unacceptable and must be vigorously rejected by the Muslim community.
Despite Mr.Khan acknowledging that “any law which contaminates shariah is impermissible”, he paradoxically promotes the KNB which contaminates the Shariah in the same way as the ill-fated MPL and MMB. It is well understand that the government cannot “legislate a system of laws that contradict Constitutional imperatives” as asserted by Mr.Khan. No one ever expects a Kufr government or even a government of so-called Muslims in Muslim lands to enact Shariah laws which conflict with the kufr laws of the kuffaar and munaafiqeen.
Muslims, that is, the sincere ones who are concerned with their Imaan, are living in a veritable spiritual minefield. We have to manoeuvre our pathway with utmost care in this minefield to avoid blowing up our Imaan. However, as far as the modernists and liberals are concerned, dilution and contamination of the Shariah are acceptable and tolerable.
Submission to kufr in the name of the Shariah as drafted by Al Jama and advocated by Adv.Khan is in fact KUFR. But these gentleman lack Imaani understanding, hence the imperatives of the Shariah are of no concern to them. In fact, as far as they are concerned, the imperatives of the Shariah as revealed by Allah Ta’ala and as expounded by the Aimmah Mujtahideen, are disposable while the constitutional imperatives of the leagues of Iblees must be accepted regardless of the damage to Imaan and even the obliteration of Imaan which is an incumbent consequence of submission to kufr.
The ‘catastrophe’ which according to Mr.Khan, Al Jama “is desirous of averting”, is a figment of his imagination. Al Jama has absolutely no Islamic credentials, and the same applies to Adv.Khan. We have lived in this country under domination of kuffaar law since time immemorial. Despite the kufr laws being heavily loaded against Muslims in matters pertaining to the Shariah, true Muslims have always been able to manoeuvre their way for circumventing the laws of Iblees – laws which Mr.Khan is promoting on behalf of Al Jama who has no mandate from either the Ulama or the Muslim community to represent us. There is no ‘catastrophe’ in kicking the KNB into the dirt bin.
The ‘Islamic scholars’ with whom Al Jama had discussed and whose support Mr.Hendricks has allegedly acquired are deviates and even morons. Any ‘scholar’ who is so stupid as to support the KNB is indeed a moron who has not understood the kufr of the KNB.
The ‘opt in-opt out’ ‘elective’ stated by Mr.Khan is a deceptive chimera to gain Muslim support for the kufr bill of Al Jama. If this ‘elective’ is truly of such vital importance as portrayed by Mr.Khan, then the government should be petitioned to enact legislation for inclusion of this ‘elective’ in their marriage bills. What is the imperative need to submit a bill loaded with kufr merely for seeking acceptance of the ‘opt in-opt out’ ‘elective’? Why should Muslims of their own accord contaminate the Shariah, i.e. advocate Kufr, to secure the pittance of the ‘elective’ suggested by Mr.Khan? Is there no other way for the acquisition of this ‘elective’ without the adoption of kufr as presented by KNB? And, if this is the only way, then confound it!
Mr.Khan, in his eager promotion of Al Jama, expressing himself in an extremely puerile manner, utters the following drivel:
“….the team of Alims (We say, the team of morons – The Majlis) and a lawyer (dwelling in deception – The Majlis) recommended that those who elected to be bound by Al Jama’s South African Law-Shariah mix would opt in and those who rejected this contamination of Shariah would opt out and would be bound by Shariah i.e. Islamic Law in its pristine form and the Legislature must establish Shariah Courts for the enforcement of rights and adjudication of disputes under the ‘purist’ Shariah system.”
Intellectual imbecility and senility are the factors which have constrained this stupid hallucination. Firstly, these chaps are bereft of the haziest understanding of the rubbish of “South African Law-Shariah mix” despite Mr.Khan’s averment of this shaitaani mix constituting “contamination of the Shariah”. Due to lack of Islamic expertise, these gentlemen are unable to fathom the meaning of their own coinage, viz. South African Law-Shariah mix. If they had a clear understanding of the Divine concepts of Imaan and Kufr, they would not have blurted out the nonsense of the ‘mix’, for this ‘mix’ is satanic and pure kufr which obliterates Imaan.
The hallucination of the government establishing “Shariah Courts” is preposterously and ludicrously puerile and stupid. There is no country today on earth where there is a valid Shariah Court with a “purist Shariah system”, not even in primitive Afghanistan. What Advocate Khan has suggested or endeavoured to explain is a stupid political narrative devoid of reality. A veronal will perhaps serve beneficially for adjusting the mental imbalance which has constrained this political stupidity emanating from these secular gentleman. It is abundantly clear that they lack even a hazy perception of the importance and significance of the Shariah. They just do not understand what the Shariah is and how it is inextricably interwoven with the fabric of Imaan. The Shariah is not the effect of some policy or expedient. It is the product of Wahi which may not be tampered with in the slightest degree.
There is a 100% or more certitude that a Shariah Court cannever function in a kuffaar state or in a Muslim country under the yoke of a secular government saddled with a kufr secular constitution. The very idea of a Shariah Court operating in a kuffaar state is illogic and dyslogistic. Can the honourable Advocate Khan hallucinate that in this country the Constitutional court or the Supreme court or the High court or even a moron magistrate’s court will not have the power to override the verdict of a ‘purist’ Shariah Court? Only a Shariah Court which has the right to operate with 100% independence, without being subservient to any court or to even the constitution – a Court whose Deeni verdict will be final and binding – may be termed a ‘purist’ Shariah Court. Anything less is a satanic hybrid kufr mix acceptable to those whose ties with Imaan are extremely slack or whose Imaan is dangling on the precipice of extinction.
Thus, the ‘Islamic elective’ mentioned by Mr.Khan is a stupid figment of hallucination. To opt out of kufr, Al Jama’s KNB is not a requisite. Muslims will just have to discover ways and means of circumventing the oppression of the government. But the way is never to accept of the kufr ‘mix’ of the KNB. While such a ‘mix’ is fine and acceptable to liberals whose brains are confined within straitjackets of western kufr education, it is abhorrent to people of healthy Imaan, hence our vehement opposition to Al Jama’s kufr bill.
Our advice for Mr.Hendricks and Mr.Khan is to refrain from meddling in a domain for which they lack expertise in entirety. Secular qualifications, regardless of the long tail of university degrees, never qualifies a man to venture opinions and fabricate concepts on matters of Shar’i import. We trust that these gentlemen lacking in Islamic perspicacity will realize that with their KNB they are getting a bit too big for their boots. KNB is an insidious attempt to normalise kufr. It is the same attempt in which the MPL and MMB proponents have failed. The bogey of ‘censure, fines and imprisonment’ with which Mr.Khan seeks to scare us and to stampede Muslims into submission does not render KNB anodyne. The kufr of KNB remains abhorrent.
“Thus have We established you on a Shariah regarding (all) matters. Therefore follow it, and do not follow the vain desires (ahwaa) of those who know not.” (Qur’aan)
We trust that these gentlemen will understand that they are among “those who know not” and they are afflicted with the loathsome Ahwaa condemned by Allah Ta’ala. The Shariah is not toy to trifle with. Both gentlemen are of an advanced age which has ushered them to the verge of the Qabr. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that the most intelligent person is he would makes preparations for the sojourn in Barzakh –in the Qabr. Understand well that cognitive dissonance will ultimately explode your Imaan.
7 Jamaadil Ula 1444 – 2 December 2022