U.K. MOLVIS PROMOTING ZINA UNDER ‘DEENI’ GUISE
While Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed: “Do not approach near to zina”, Molvis nowadays, especially in the U.K. which appears to have become the headquarters for scum molvis and muftis, are promoting zina by means of satanic ruses.
A Student of the Deen, explaining the haraam shenanigans of some U.K. juhala molvis writes:
“Two prominent “Muftis” in UK, namely Mufti Muhammad ibn Adam Al-Kawathari and Mufti Abdur-Rahman Mangera have been delivering “Islamic” courses/lectures to mixed-gatherings.
Ordinarily, there is no naming and shaming in Islam, but when sins are committed openly, flagrantly and repeatedly by people purporting to be scholars, and which in turn the masses will use to legitimise haraam, then these people need to be condemned publicly.
One of these Muftis has gone so far as to justify mixed gatherings by name-dropping Mufti Taqi Usmani. Our proofs are Qur’an, Sunnah, Ijma, Qiyas and reference is had to the fuqaha of the khayrul quroon. Mufti Taqi Usmani, who has promoted much haraam himself, and is a member of the World Economic Forum, is not hujjah for us.
The second reason Mufti Kawthari gives for permissibility of mixed gatherings is because he was not the organiser. That’s like arguing that he went to a brothel to give da’wah.
Besides, every and any means is not permissible to propagate the Deen. In propagating the Deen, the method used must preserve the Deen. Both Hifazat-e-Deen (protection of Deen) & Ishàat-e-Deen (propagation of Deen) are important. Hifazat-e-Deen is muqaddam (primary) & Ishâ’at-e-deen’s mu’akkhar (secondary). To destroy the 1st (Hifazat-e-Deen) for the sake of the second (ishâ’at-e-din) is not regarded as Deen & is contrary to the demands of intelligence.
These same Muftis condemn attending mixed gathering weddings but fail to realise their crime is worse. Most lay people who attend mixed weddings know its wrong, acknowledge it as haraam and will not attend another one for a few months. Yet these shayateen Muftis try to justify their haraam using an Islamic veneer, thus promoting it to the masses. Whose worse? The layman that attends a mixed wedding or these shayateen Muftis?
Some lay people have called out this zina promotion under the guise of an “Islamic” course/lecture, but the Ulama of UK conveniently remain silent. It’s like the cartel protecting one of their own. None of the UK Ulama will call out Mufti Muhammad because he is the son of a well-known pious Shaykh. Isn’t this what the Jews did? One rule for one and one rule for another. What does the Qur’an say about nepotism?
No small wonder then that many people don’t trust the Ulama nowadays.”
(End of the dissertation of the Student)
As lamentable as the molvi rot may be, it has to be accepted as an integral cog in the Muslim Ummah of this age in proximity of Qiyaamah. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had predicted the rise and preponderance of the ulama-e-soo’ who will be the agents of Iblees digging up the foundations of the Deen.
It is of imperative importance for the Ulama-e-Haqq to abandon their dubious ‘hikmat’ diplomacy, and to alert the masses to the danger to Imaan which these shaitaani agents pose for the Akhlaaq and even the Imaan of the ignorant and unwary masses.
The ‘hikmat’ of silence of the Ulama is actually a shaitaani snare in which these Ulama are trapped. Their ‘hikmat’ is the product of their nafs. Confound such ‘hikmat’ which aids the promotion of vice – fisq, fujoor and kufr.
16 Jamaadith Thaani 1445 – 30 December 2023