THE KUFR NIKAH BILL ISSUE-
THE DUBIOSITY AND UNRELIABILITY OF AL JAMA-AH PARTY
ADVOCATE SALEEM KHAN’S EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE
From the most recent response of Advocate M.S.Khan to The Majlis, the following issues are mentioned and explained:
(1) That the tone of The Majlis is harsh and offensive. The greater part of his letter deals with the tone of The Majlis. Our response to this averment is that it is a waste of time to offer us naseehat pertaining to our tone and style of acquittal in our discharge of the obligation of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar. This writer is on the threshold of the Qabar, and he shall be leaving this dunya accompanied by this divinely bestowed tone and style which is one of the weapons for excoriating the zanadaqah and those who masquerade as Muslims. It is not an acquired or emulated attribute. He was born with it. We therefore advise Advocate Khan and others of the same understanding to abstain from wasting their time proferring advice on our tone. Our tone is here to remain until our eyes close with the command of Allah Ta’ala.
(2) That he did not and does not promote the political agenda of any political party. Thus, he is not in support of Ganief Hendrick’s KNB (Note: KNB is our coinage, not of Advocate Khan – The Majlis).
(3) That he labelled a haraam fictitious haraam bill falsely attributed to The Majlis by Ganief Hendricks as being the ‘Majlis Bill’. In this regard, the Advocate states:
“I made reference to the so-called ‘Majlis Bill’ because Mr.Hendricks said to me, that he has a 100 percent recollection of his discussions with you in relation thereto.”
Mr.Saleem Khan has grossly erred by relying on the word of a Faasiq and on such fictitious basis as provided by the Faasiq, he (Advocate Khan) grievously slandered The Majlis. Mr.Saleem had further, due to the emotional underline, failed to apply his mind cognitively. The total impossibility of the claim of Hendricks never occurred to him. The Majlis has vigorously campaigned against MPL and MMB for more than three decades. We left no stone unturned in our condemnation of the Kufr of these satanic marriage bills. Now how could it ever have been possible for The Majlis to have crafted the most insidious marriage bill which is worse than its two illegitimate sisters (MPL and MMB)?
Furthermore, Advocate Khan being a senior lawyer as well as senior in age and experience should have heeded is own advice. He should have first referred the kufr fiction to us for comment. In a letter to Brother Elias Ahmed, Advocate Khan said in reference to The Majlis: “…highly defamatory posts against me, without first discussing with me were grave wrongs.”
Advocate Khan was supposed to have adhered to his principle before having slandered The Majlis. The Qur’aan Majeed states:
“O People of Imaan! If there comes to you a faasiq with any information (or news), then verify it lest you harm a people in ignorance, then you will become remorseful of your deeds.” (Al-Hujuraat, Aayat 6)
Any Muslim who is aware of Mr.Hendricks will understand that from the perspective of the Shariah, at a minimum, he is a confirmed faasiq, hence it is haraam to accept his words without independent verification. Yet, Advocate Khan blindly accepted the faasiq’s ‘100%’ assurance which has now been established is a pure fiction and worse. It is buhtaan (slander) against The Majlis. Therefore, Mr.Khan’s explanation in no way whatsoever ameliorate, leave alone rectifies, the grievous error he has committed – the error of buhtaan against us.
(4) Advocate Khan had also implied that The Majlis had squandered public funds in the process of promoting the fictitious kufr bill. He has implied that The Majlis is guilty of embezzlement of funds. What is the proof for this vile and oppressive slander? Thus he said in his letter:
“What is to become of that bill for the production of which you paid obviously from funds emanating from those who pay you for your activities.”
The senior advocate has acquitted himself on this issue as if the disinformation and falsity disgorged by Ganief are facts of certitude. This slander is totally unexpected of a senior Advocate of Mr.Khan’s calibre. There is not a shred of evidence – not a vestige of a basis for having disgorged this slander. We trust that Advocate Khan will ruminate over this slander to comprehend the gravity and notoriety of his scandalous averment based purely on the word of a faasiq.
(5) Advocate Khan states in his statement: “I will for the benefit of the readers whatsapp also the highly derogatory Majlis post and the bill submitted to Parliament by Mr.Desai.”
Advocate Khan owes it to the Muslim community to provide his proof for his categorical claim: “the bill submitted to Parliament by Mr.Desai.”
The Majlis does not seek an apology from either Hendricks or Advocate Khan. We do not believe in apologies. Those who are afflicted with the spiritual maladies of hubb-e-jaah (love for name/fame) and hubb-e-maal (love for money) are in need of apologies, hence they are swift in their journey to the kuffaar court for the haraam jeefah (carrion) concept dubbed ‘defamation’.
While we do not want an apology from the two gentlemen for their slanders, we expect them to clarify the gaff/slander/falsehood by stating unequivocally that they had erred by attributing the haraam kufr bill to The Majlis. The Shariah and Honour demand this as a minimum requisite for setting the record straight. May Allah Ta’ala guide them.
13 Jamaadith Thaani 1444 – 6 January 2023